Rudlin Consulting Rudlin Consulting
  • Blog
  • About
  • Clients
  • Services
  • Publications
  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • English
  • Blog
  • About
  • Clients
  • Services
  • Publications
  • Privacy
  • Contact
  • English
  •  

kanebo

Home / Posts Tagged "kanebo"

Tag: kanebo

Time to end the Japanese style ‘salaryman collective’

ToshibaJapan needs to part ways with “management by collective” says Kazuhiko Toyama, formerly the COO of the Industrial Revitalization Corporation of Japan and now CEO of Industrial Growth Platform Inc. He’s also a Stanford MBA and outside executive director of Omron. In an interview with Nikkei Business magazine, he argues for a complete change in corporate governance for not just Japanese companies, but also other “closed” companies like Volkswagen.

“I’m in favour of a constitutional monarchy” says Toyama, “but Volkswagen was a monarchy without a constitution. That’s dangerous for a public listed company.” “Toshiba is a salaryman collective – where the members are only those who joined as graduate hires and stayed for life.”

He dismisses Toshiba’s pre-scandal corporate governance, which included several external directors, as “cosmetic”. Governance by Toyama’s definition is “how are the most important decisions in the company made. One of the most important decisions is the appointment of the top executives. It should be like a government election”, he says. “If you avoid debate, then it just becomes a game of tag.”

I found his analogy of Japan’s corporate governance to Japanese politics convincing. In previous decades, he points out, the Japanese main bank system provided a form of governance, and this worked in a period of economic growth, because the main financing was through bank loans. But now Japanese companies are more reliant on financing through equity and bonds, this system has lost its efficacy. Since 1990, freed from the leash of the main bank, the salaryman collective system has grown up, whereby Japanese companies pretend to be answerable to the shareholders meeting (as if it was a general election) but in fact the board is like the diet (parliament), where there are factions and parties who are opposing the President’s faction. The company is therefore governed by something similar to a cabinet.

Cross shareholdings were popular, because they sapped the strength of shareholder democracy. Lifetime employment and seniority based promotion are constructs of the post war era according to Toyama (and many other analysts). “It’s only been 50 years since they fully took root. Before the war, Japan was nakedly capitalist, but that ended with the Mitsui Miike mine dispute in the 1960s. If you said something that only dated from then was rooted in Japanese culture, Kabuki actors would laugh at you”

“Japanese companies say they look after their people, but in fact they are only looking after the permanent, life time employees. They won’t fire the lifetime employees – the social hurdles are much higher than the legal hurdles to doing this. So instead they cut back on contract workers or shrink their graduate intake. What was that Japanese management theory about, that said in pursuit of long term growth, it was OK to sacrifice short term profits, in order to protect employees?”

“It also became taboo to dispose of businesses. When I was involved with the restructure of Kanebo (another window dressing scandal), we sold of parts of the business, without having to make people redundant. Disposals need to happen quickly if you want to avoid people losing their jobs. I was criticised at the time by the Kanebo staff who were in the businesses that were disposed of, but afterwards one of them apologised to me for what he had said, and told me that his family is very happy now.”

“Before being an employee, people are above all need to make a living, to have a life. They may cry when they have to leave a company, but the next day, they have to work to live somewhere, somehow. This is what you have to respect, if you are serious about looking after the people.”

“Toshiba will probably have to make radical changes to its PC and TV businesses. It probably will necessitate someone from outside the main Toshiba mothership. Just as Kawamura was able to come back into the main Hitachi company, having run Hitachi group businesses elsewhere, and be able to look at what was needed, objectively (as I have blogged previously) and engage with the vertical – the business units, where the restructuring really needs to happen. “

“The two big waves of globalization and digitization hit businesses in the 1990s. The Japanese IT industry was not able to overcome them, but the automotive companies were able to ignore the digitization wave and overcome the globalization challenge by increasing mass production. But it won’t be so easy from now. Radical changes are going to be necessary in the way companies are structured. Companies need to have a portfolio of business that they can swap and change easily and quickly. They need to be able to attract and retain the best global talent. If you’re a female Chinese university student looking for a first job and you see a Japanese board line up on a potential employer’s website, full of Japanese men in their 50s and 60s, you’re not going to see your future there.”

For more content like this, subscribe to the free Rudlin Consulting Newsletter.

Share Button
Read More
Kao – reflections on acquiring Kanebo, Molton Brown, John Frieda

Kao the $14bn beauty, household and chemicals company has been active in overseas acquisitions for more than a decade now, acquiring John Frieda in 2002 and Molton Brown in 2005, but is better known in Japan for its domestic acquisiton of cosmetics, pharmaceuticals and textiles company Kanebo in 2006.  This followed the near collapse of Kanebo after a “window dressing” financial scandal in which senior Kanebo executives collaborated with the auditors PwC to falsify accounts.

Domestic acquisitions in Japan are often not entirely initiated by the acquirer, and often follow government pressure to rescue lame ducks, for the good of the nation.  It can be imagined that Kao, in many ways a competitor to Kanebo, had several barriers to overcome in successfully integrating Kanebo.  And indeed, last year’s “skin whitening” recall by Kanebo and the slowness of Kao to make any public statement on this, prompted many to think Kao really had not yet got a grip on Kanebo.

In an interview last year in the Nikkei Business (in Japanese, subscription only), Michitaka Sawada, President of Kao, was at pains to describe Kanebo as a “superb, adult company” that takes responsibility for its own mistakes.  As the parent company, Kao will of course support them he said, and not leave things at that level.  “We will apologise all we can, but what is important is to focus on what we need to do next”.

It’s interesting to note the “family” analogy there, so common in Japanese companies, and also the distinct flavour of “hansei” (which we describe in our Japan Intercultural Consulting seminars) – a process of apology, reflection and redress in what he says.

Apparently information flows stopped above a certain level, and there was not the right atmosphere for disclosing problems.  There was not a problem in product development, he asserts, more that after sales follow up was not sufficient.  The consolidation of Kanebo and Kao’s R&D functions in October 2013 was not related to the skin whitening scandal.  All of Kanebo’s functions such as sales, marketing, production had been left independent after the acquisition, but Sawada questions whether that is now the correct strategy, when thinking about future growth.

“We said at the time we were acquiring Kanebo in order to lead Japan’s cosmetics market and expand globally, but although we do have the biggest market share, I am not sure we can say our brands have responded to the changing environment, nor that we have expanded globally as much as we intended”.

When asked if he intended other acquisitions such as Molton Brown to stay independent, he says the beauty care division is also reviewing the reasons for acquiring and working out how they can contribute to the growth of Kao’s beauty care business.  “We can learn new tastes from Molton Brown, and use each other’s technology to grow the business.  We may have to do something more to grow.  If we do not reach our targets we have to ask whether we continue to support the business.  We were too lenient in the way we conducted M&A in the past and did not do enough reviewing.”

For more content like this, subscribe to the free Rudlin Consulting Newsletter.

Share Button
Read More
Kao stops worrying about Kanebo losing face

Kao, the parent of Kanebo, has decided to integrate the two companies more fully, following criticism from the Japanese government of Kanebo’s delay in recalling its skin whitening products, which had caused skin blotches.

Kao, Japan’s equivalent of Procter & Gamble, acquired Kanebo in 2006, following Kanebo falling into financial difficulties, having been found out to have “window dressed” its financial reporting.  This was the cause of much punning at the time, as Kanebo is a cosmetics company, and window dressing is known as “powdering the face” in Japan.

Kao says it kept Kanebo at arm’s length “out of respect for a company that has been in the cosmetics business much longer than Kao has, with cooperation limited to such steps as integration of distribution sites and joint procurement of materials.”

Kao is huge in the Japanese domestic market, and has made a few forays into Europe and North America, largely through the acquisition of professional haircare brands (such as Goldwell, Jergens, John Frieda) and upmarket retail beauty brands such as Molton Brown.

For more content like this, subscribe to the free Rudlin Consulting Newsletter.

Share Button
Read More

Last updated by Pernille Rudlin at 2015-12-13.

Recent Posts

  • Are there 10% or 1% fewer Japanese companies in the UK than five years’ ago? And why?
  • An end to one size fits all training in Japan
  • Hitachi in the UK – from TVs to trains (part 1)
  • Takiron – first Japanese company in Wales
  • Mitsubishi Electric in the UK – 1979 to present

Categories

  • Africa
  • Brexit
  • China and Japan
  • Coaching
  • Corporate brands, values and mission
  • Corporate culture
  • Corporate Governance
  • cross cultural awareness
  • customer service
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • European identity
  • Globalization
  • History of Japanese companies in UK
  • Human resources
  • Innovation
  • Internal communications
  • Japanese business etiquette
  • Japanese business in Europe
  • Japanese customers
  • M&A
  • Management and Leadership
  • Marketing
  • Middle East
  • negotiation
  • Presentation skills
  • Reputation
  • Seminars
  • Social & Digital Media
  • speaker events
  • Trade
  • Uncategorized
  • Virtual communication
  • webinars
  • Women in Japanese companies
Web Development: counsell.com