Rudlin Consulting

Search results for: “fujitsu”

  • “Job type system” not the cure-all for Japanese employee engagement

    “Job type system” not the cure-all for Japanese employee engagement

    Fast Retailing (Uniqlo) has caused quite a stir in Japan by announcing that it will raise salaries by up to 40%. It claims this is in order to bring the Japanese salaries more into line with what Uniqlo is paying staff overseas, so that staff can be transferred to and from Japan HQ more easily. Japanese companies have been under pressure from the government for some time to increase salaries and this seems to some extent a typically punchy move by Fast Retailing CEO and founder Yanai-san, who has always favoured being provocative and going against the mainstream.

    As any global compensation expert will tell you, it’s not quite as simple as paying people the same for the same job around the world, given the very different living standards and cost of living. Nonetheless, if Japanese companies want to introduce the “job type” system, where the compensation is defined by a job description, rather than a seniority based generalist track with no job description, which has been the tradition in Japan, they are going to have to consider some kind of parity in remuneration, to make it attractive and easy for their employees to move around the world.

    As Dr Kawai Kaoru, workplace health scientist, has pointed out in a recent article for Nikkei Business, the reality of the uptake of the “job type system” has not lived up to the media hype. The same names keep coming up – Hitachi, Fujitsu, Astellas, KDDI, Mitsubishi Chemical, Shiseido and Kagome. According to Dr Kawai’s research “an overwhelming number of companies said they had no plans to introduce a job-based system.”

    Those who are introducing a job type system are expecting it to re-energise their staff, improving autonomy, empowerment and engagement. Kawai cautions against seeing the job type system as being a cure-all for employee motivation. Her worry is that too much emphasis on the individual may ignore the fact that what really energises employees in their work is a sense of interdependency – that other people rely on them and they can rely on others, in order to get things done.

    She points out that the five factors needed for high employee engagement (which I have seen appear in many an employee engagement survey) are

    1. Sufficient resources to do the job
    2. Discretionary power to make decisions, get things done
    3. Being recognised and rewarded for good work
    4. Fairness – being respected and able to express opinions, regardless of age, gender, nationality etc.
    5. Community – that staff members help each other and trust each other

    Japanese companies have always been strong on the last point – Dr Kawai and I are both hoping it is not lost in the quest for a more global standard.

  • Has the time come for Japan’s Nadeshiko Brand to include overseas female employees?

    Has the time come for Japan’s Nadeshiko Brand to include overseas female employees?

    The Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry announced in October last year that they are revamping their their Nadeshiko* Brand – the annual selection of Japanese companies that are outstanding in their encouragement of the success of women in the workplace. As well as quantitative questions, this time they are asking more qualitative questions, on areas such as “whether the systems and measures to promote [women’s success in the workplace] are linked to management strategies.” The aim is to evaluate “whether each company has visualized a consistent story whether they are conveying information effectively throughout Japan and overseas”. The background to this change seems to be the increasing pressure on Japanese and other multinationals to be more transparent – for example making more disclosures of information such as the gender pay gap reporting requirement in the UK.

    I am wondering whether this evaluation will cover more than the communication of initiatives overseas. Will they also be including their overseas employees in their quantitative questions, and also in the systems and measures?  It has been a longstanding bugbear of mine that many Japanese companies publish plenty of information about the diversity of their Japanese workforce, but very little detail about their overseas employees. In the case of Japanese trading companies, they do not publish any figures on the numbers of people that are working at their overseas subsidiaries. It would seem they literally do not count.

    When I last took a look at the boards of the largest Japanese companies in the UK, in 2016, it was clear there were fewer women on the boards of Japanese companies in the UK than there were even in Japan.  I also found differences in the degree of national diversity – some boards in the UK were all Japanese (and almost all men), and some hardly had any Japanese on the board.

    Seven years on, there has undoubtedly been progress, of sorts. The pressures that I pointed to in 2016, such as the stricter demands from UK and other financial regulatory authorities on Japanese financial services companies to have more diverse boards or for Japanese companies who are public sector suppliers (Hitachi, Fujitsu) to be more diverse have worked.

    Fujitsu UK proudly points out on its website that it was one of the first companies to report on its gender pay gap, in 2017, since when, there has been a 44% reduction in the median gap to 10% and a 43% reduction in the mean to 9.6%. They have also published their first ever ethnicity pay gap, even though this is not a government mandated requirement.  They also have a female Managing Director for the UK, a first I believe. She and the former UK MD and the head of Global Legal (both male) are the three board members – there are no Japanese board directors. In 2016 there were 6 people on the board, all male, one of whom was Japanese. The board in Japan has also undergone an overhaul, as have many Japanese boards, with the governance laws mandating them to appoint external directors. Fujitsu Japan has only two representative directors, both Japanese males, and 6 external directors, two of whom are female and one is an American male (albeit a fluent Japanese speaker and permanent resident in Japan).  Fujitsu was a Nadeshiko brand in 2016, but not since.

    Daiwa Capital Markets Europe also recently appointed its first ever female CEO – who is dual nationality British/South African. There are nine members of the DCME board in the UK, five of whom are non executive directors and the majority of whom are not Japanese. Of the non-executive directors, 3 are female non-Japanese, 2 are male Japanese. The other three members of the board besides the CEO are one Japanese male in the UK, 1 Japanese male in Japan and one South African/British male in the UK, who is the Chair. The holding company for Daiwa Capital Markets Europe, Daiwa Securities, has been a Nadeshiko brand every year since 2013. Its gender pay gap in the UK is nonetheless quite high for 2021, above the financial institutions average of 32% for the mean, at 38.8% mean, 37.9% median. Perhaps this will change with the new CEO in place.

    The services sector has rather different challenges to the automotive manufacturing sector both in Japan and in the UK. In Japan, only Toyota group member Aisin is a Nadeshiko brand in the transportation equipment category. Nissan points out that 92% of its 7,342 employees, across manufacturing, design, parts and sales and marketing in the UK are male. Looking at their gender pay gap numbers, it’s clear that there is a higher proportion of women in bonus attracting, presumably white collar jobs and middle management, and a higher percentage of men than women are in lower paid blue collar jobs. Nonetheless, a gender pay gap of 6.4% median and 8.7% mean was identified. The UK boards of both the manufacturing and the sales and marketing side are 100% non-Japanese in composition, but no female representation. Nissan was named as a Nadeshiko brand in 2017 but not since.

    Presumably, as in previous years, the announcement of the FY2022 Nadeshiko brands will be made in March 2023. It will be interesting to see what has changed.

    * Nadeshiko is a Japanese flower that is also native to northern Europe  – “pink”, of course. 

  • Hitachi expands “job type” system to cover all employees, domestic + overseas

    Hitachi expands “job type” system to cover all employees, domestic + overseas

    Hitachi has been heading in the direction of unifying its Japan and ex-Japan human resources systems for some years now, so switching all Japan-hired staff to the more Western style “job type” system, away from seniority based promotion, was to be expected. But it is nonetheless a radical step for one of Japan’s biggest companies. If other Japanese companies are able to follow suit, this would help remove one of the most significant hidden barriers to non-Japanese and other “diverse” people being able to rise to more senior roles in the headquarters.

    Most Japanese multinationals make a distinction between “proper” staff – hired in Japan, straight from university, with no job descriptions, on a general track which is influenced by seniority and the promise of lifetime employment and possibility to reach the very top of the company –  and “contract” staff – those with job descriptions who are usually hired mid-career and have no job security or prospects of promotion. Those employees hired outside Japan are seen as being in the latter category.

    Fujitsu has applied the “job type” system to 90% of its Japanese employees from April 2022. NEC is introducing the system to its senior management from April 2023 and expanding to the rest of the Japan hired staff from 2024. NTT finished introducing it to all management staff in 2021/2.

    In Hitachi‘s case it became a necessity to do this, because of its major overseas acquisitions of ABB power grids and GlobalLogic, bringing in more than 100,000 overseas employees into the group. As of October 2022 the ratio of non-Japanese in Hitachi’s board of directors was 18% and the company aims to increase this to 30% in the mid to long term.

    It’s not surprising that it is Japan’s technology and IT companies that are pioneering this. Such a move is an important precondition for digital transformation – it will make it easier to hire specialists such as AI engineers and data scientists, who would expect higher remuneration than would be available under the old generalist track, seniority based system.

  • Telecoms takeover of Japan’s top CSR rankings

    Telecoms takeover of Japan’s top CSR rankings

    Comparing the top ranked Japanese companies for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)  in Toyo Keizai’s 2022 rankings* with the 2007 rankings shows how the Japanese corporate landscape has changed. The three telecoms companies – NTT, NTT DoCoMo and KDDI – have taken over the top 3 positions. In 2007 the top 3 positions went to the heavy engineering and electronics companies Toshiba, Hitachi and Canon. Sharp, Panasonic. Fujifilm and Sony also made appearances over the years, as did automotive companies such as Denso, Toyota and Nissan.

    The woes of Toshiba, Hitachi, Sharp and Nissan over the past 15 years are well documented but although Toshiba and Hitachi are in the 2022 top 50, Nissan and Sharp are at 437 and 179 respectively. Canon, Panasonic, Fujifilm and Sony are still in the top 50 along with other electronics and IT companies such as Fujitsu, NEC, Omron, Mitsubishi Electric and Seiko Epson.  Denso and Toyota are all still in the top 50 along with other automotive companies such as Aisin, Bridgestone, Isuzu and Honda.  Despite being tobacco or drinks companies, JTI is ranked at 7, down from #4, Suntory is at #8, one down from #7 in 2021, Asahi at 28, up from #33 and Kirin at #31, down from #10.

    A Japanese trading company (shosha) has entered the top 10 for the first time.  Mitsui has shot up from #64 in 2021 to #4 – all the more remarkable as it used to be seen as one of the more hardcore traditionalists of the 5 big shosha. The second highest ranked shosha is Itochu, up to #22 from #37. Sumitomo Corporation is at #40, down from #26 and Mitsubishi Corporation is at #45 up from #58. Marubeni is somewhat lagging the other shosha at #112, up from #143. Toyo Keizai singled out Mitsui’s distributed power supply project, using solar power and storage batteries for non-electrified areas of India and use of carbon offsets through a company owned forest as contributing to its high ranking.

    Some of the companies whose rankings have fallen considerably include Nidec (down from 67 to 174, scoring low on environment) and Recruit, down from #62 to 172, also scoring low on environment and Ricoh, down from #47 to #217, with a lower score in HR.

    *500 companies ranked by scores out of 600 for finance (300), HR (100), governance (100) and environment (100).

  • Top 30 Japanese Employers in Germany – 2022

    Top 30 Japanese Employers in Germany – 2022

    The latest top 30 Japanese employers for Germany (download available below) show that even in manufacturing centric Germany, services are beginning to dominate. Outsourcing, a recruitment and staffing company are now the largest Japanese company in Germany, replacing Sumitomo Electric Industries, thanks to their acquisition of Orizon in 2017.

    We have shifted Sumitomo Electric Industries from the top spot to #23 – not because they have laid a large number of people off, but because we suspect that previous data regarding employee numbers contained a large proportion who were working in SEI factories outside of Germany.  We have had similar issues with the data for Panasonic and LIXIL.

    NTT has risen from #3 to #2 although it seems to have shed a few employees – conversely, Fujitsu has dropped from #2 to #4 as the consequences of closing the factory in Augsburg and other restructuring have fed through. DMG Mori may have expanded by over a third (but this could be double counting problems again, as there are around 20 DMG Mori subsidiaries in Germany), and is now the third largest Japanese employer in Germany, with 5,800 employees.

    There is an increasing issue with disclosure and therefore verifying employee numbers  – particularly with companies like Sony who have restructured their European organisation so that many of their subsidiaries are branches. We’ve put Sony at #30, with 1000 employees, but it probably has more than that.

    Hitachi has grown by over 1,000 employees due to the acquisition of the power grids business from ABB, now renamed Hitachi Energy and is the 8th biggest Japanese employer in Germany as a result.

    The Top 30 largest Japanese company groupings in Germany can  be downloaded below. If you would like more detail on the 206 companies included in the top 30 company groups of employers, each with full company name and employee number, for £9.99/€12, please contact us.

    PDF DOWNLOAD OF TOP 30 JAPANESE EMPLOYERS IN GERMANY 2022

  • Top 30 Japanese employers in Europe, Middle East and Africa – 2021

    Top 30 Japanese employers in Europe, Middle East and Africa – 2021

    The total number of people employed by the 30 largest Japanese companies in Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) has grown over the past year – despite the pandemic – but only by 3% overall. The top 30 employ around 557,000 people between them in the EMEA region, representing around 14% of their total global workforce. The average masks a wide range, from only 6% of the workforce (Itochu, TDK) through to 45% (Nippon Sheet Glass/Pilkington).

    The growers

    The company group which grew the most over 2020-21 was Hitachi (by 82%), now the fourth biggest Japanese employer in Europe, with over 32,000 employees, due to their acquisition of ABB Power Grids, now Hitachi Energy. The Hitachi group have almost tripled in size in Europe since 2014/5, despite various divestments, due not only to Hitachi Energy but also the growth of Hitachi Rail.

    We estimate Outsourcing (does pretty much what it ‘says on the tin‘) has also grown considerably, but as they do not publish employee figures by region in their annual report it’s hard to be accurate. It acquired CPL, Otto Works, Orizon and other recruitment and staffing companies over the past few years, and is now the 11th biggest Japanese employer in the region.  Their rival Recruit also grew considerably, thanks to their acquisition of Indeed in 2019.

    Toyota Tsusho, the trading company within the Toyota group, has also grown both in the past year (21%) and over the past few years (52%), since the acquisition of French company CFAO in 2016 and consequent expansion in Africa. It is now the sixth largest Japanese employer in EMEA.

    The shrinkers

    Fujitsu shrank the most from 2020-2021, by 20%, but this was largely to do with India being removed from what was the EMIEA region. Since 2014/5 Fujitsu has restructured, with fewer people employed in Western Europe and more more employees added in global delivery centres in Eastern Europe.

    Sony has also been through restructuring in the region, and now has fewer than 10,000 employees, compared to over 13,000 six years’ ago. Other companies that have shrunk both over the past year and over the past six years are Ricoh, Nissan and Honda. Honda will no doubt drop out of the Top 30 for 2021/22 once the closure of the Swindon UK plant shows in their annual report.

    The Top 3

    The two largest Japanese employers in the region, Sumitomo Electric Industries and Yazaki, have dominated throughout the past six years – both manufacture labour intensive wire harnesses, with factories in North Africa and Eastern Europe. SEI grew by a third since 2014/5 and Yazaki has cut back in the past few years and has more or less the same number of employees as six years ago.

    NTT and its subsidiary NTT Data overtook Fujitsu a couple of years’ ago and are now the third largest employer in the region, having more than doubled in size thanks to the acquisitions of Dimension Data, Keane and Dell Services in recent years.

    The new entrant

    The new entrant into the Top 30 for 2021 was trading company Mitsubishi Corporation, who expanded following their acquisition of Dutch energy company ENECO in 2019. They displaced bathroom fittings company LIXIL whose employee numbers decreased after their divestment of Italian company Permasteelisa.

    PDF DOWNLOAD OF TOP 30 JAPANESE EMPLOYERS IN EMEA 2021

  • Top 30 Japanese companies in Poland 2021

    Top 30 Japanese companies in Poland 2021

    Poland and other Eastern European nations are a forgotten economic success story, according to Ruchir Sharma of Morgan Stanley Investment Management in a recent Financial Times opinion piece. The Czech and Slovak Republics, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, and Slovenia have all made it into the advanced economies, as defined by the IMF, and have a per capita income of $17,000, with Poland not far behind at a per capita income of $15,000. Hungary is even closer, with per capita income of $16,000 and Romania is also catching up, on $13,000.  Quality of institutions and other more subjective factors are included in the IMF criteria, so it may be that if some of these countries are judged to have deteriorated under a populist government, then promotion to the premier division will be delayed.

    Sharma argues that consistent long term growth is the key to economic success, and manufacturing prowess lies behind this for Eastern Europe. Poland has grown at an average of 4% a year over the past three decades, without a single year of negative growth. Japanese companies do seem to have been attracted to this economic stability. According to our research, Japanese companies in Poland now employ around 53,000 people, making it the fourth largest base for Japanese company employees in the European region after the UK (176,000), Germany (167,000) and France (75,000).

    The largest Japanese employers in Poland are indeed manufacturers such as Sumitomo Electric Industries (Sumitomo Electric Wiring/Bordnetze producing harnesses and Sumitomo Riko producing hoses for the automotive industry) and other automotive suppliers such as NGK Insulators, NSG (automotive glass), Toyota Motor, NSK, Bridgestone and Yazaki.

    Beer and cigarette manufacturers also feature – Asahi after their acquisition of Polish beer brands Tyskie and Lech, and Japan Tobacco has a factory in Poland manufacturing Winston and Camel. A further vice, chocolate, is also manufactured by a Japan headquartered company Lotte, via their 2010 acquisition of Wedel.

    There are some large services sector employers as well – Fujitsu has around 3,000 employees working in its global delivery centres in Katowice and Łódź. However, we estimate around a third of the 200 Japanese companies in Poland have plants there, compared to 16% of the 1000+ Japanese companies in the UK or Germany.

    We may still be missing a few Japanese companies in Poland. There are relatively fewer Japanese expatriates in Poland compared to other countries which host larger numbers of Japanese companies. This may cause some underreporting to database survey companies such as Toyo Keizai, which only records around 130 Japanese companies in Poland, and less than 20,000 employees, compared to our estimates of over 200 companies and 53,000 employees.  There is still a tendency by Japanese companies to locate their Japanese expatriates in Germany, to manage Eastern European subsidiaries and branches from there. The Polish investment agency says there are 300 companies in Poland employing over 40,000, in 2019.

    Cornel Ban, of the Copenhagen Business School, responded to Sharma’s piece by arguing that a high risk of stagnation in countries such as Poland is “baked in”, if they only rely on low labour costs. There is a lack of investment in training and R&D and that “the multinational manufacturing firms that dominate these countries’ export-led growth regimes have few incentives to relocate significant technical innovation systems in the region.”  As far as we can ascertain, there are only a few Japanese companies that are conducting R&D in Poland – Canon Ophthalmic Technologies, Fujitsu‘s FQS in computational chemistry systems and Rigaku in thin films and materials.

    PDF DOWNLOAD OF TOP 30 JAPANESE EMPLOYERS IN POLAND 2021

  • Latest Top 30 Japanese companies in UK shows significant divergence

    Latest Top 30 Japanese companies in UK shows significant divergence

    Our latest Top 30 Japanese companies in the UK shows a 1.3% drop overall in employee numbers from 2019 to 2020*, the first fall we have seen in the seven years we have been tracking the Top 30. As most Japanese companies in the UK use an April 1 to March 31 financial year, the fall in employee numbers dates to before COVID-19 pandemic began to have an impact. The small drop masks significant divergences – there were companies whose workforce shrank by over 10% such as Nissan, Honda and Nomura, and also companies which grew significantly, such as NTT and SoftBank.

    This tallies with a recent report from Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) which reported in March 2021 that whereas automotive sector companies have a bleak outlook on the UK market, manufacturers in sectors such as chemicals, pharmaceuticals, electrical machinery and foods are far more positive about future expansion in the UK. According to METI, manufacturers represent around 39% of Japanese companies in the UK, the remainder being in the services and wholesale sectors.  Services sectors, particularly IT related, would seem to be positive too from our researches, apart from Fujitsu, which has slipped down a further place to being the 4th largest Japanese employer in the UK, having been the largest for many years previously, to 2017/8.

    The 96,000 who work for the Top 30 Japanese companies in the UK represent around 55% of the 176,000 (down from 179,000 the previous year) or so people who work for over a 1,000 Japanese companies in the UK, according to our estimates.  The METI survey shows that despite the small drop in the numbers employed by the Top 30, larger companies (defined by METI as having over £600m turnover) will have weathered Brexit far more easily than smaller ones, having the resources and networks to set up agents in the EU, stockpile and open up new logistics and warehousing hubs on the Continent.

    Certainly the 50 or so Japanese companies that have withdrawn from the UK over 2019-20 have been smaller in size (under 50 employees) and the larger ones who have shut down operations have usually not withdrawn entirely but rather turned their subsidiaries into branches or merged them with another UK based operation.

    As we have said for some years now, Brexit has brought about an acceleration of trends which were happening anyway, and precipitated some long overdue tidying up.

    FREE PDF DOWNLOAD OF TOP 30 JAPANESE EMPLOYERS IN THE UK 2021

    *2020 defined as the year ending 2020, where most of the year was in 2019, ie April 2019 to March 2020 or January 2019 to December 2019.

  • Top Japanese companies for CSR in UK

    Top Japanese companies for CSR in UK

    Only around 10% of Japanese companies in the UK mention any charitable donations in their annual reports, and yet according to Toyo Keizai, many of the largest Japanese companies in the UK top the rankings for contributions to corporate social responsibility, measured in Yen.*

    Top of the ranking is Honda, which spent Y9.57bn ($87m) on contributing to society in 2019/20. Activities included a national robot contest and the Honda Eco Mileage Challenge – a competition to see how far a car can be driven on a liter of gasoline, as well as beach cleanups.  CSR outside Japan is also included, such as Honda’s professional training course in South America, a Dream Riding Program for women in India and tree planting in Inner Mongolia.

    Pharmaceutical companies have always been big corporate givers, unsurprisingly. Takeda is the second largest CSR donor in Japan, spending Y8.55bn (a significant increase on previous years) on the Takeda Science Foundation awards, research grants etc as well as volunteer activities. Third is NTT DoCoMo who have created a DoCoMo forest in 49 locations in Japan and provide scholarships for Asian students.

    Other companies in the top 50 who also have substantial presence in the UK include Suntory, SECOM, MUFG, Canon, Panasonic, SoftBank, Sony, Aisin, Eisai, Komatsu, Nomura, Hitachi, Mitsubishi Corporation, Nissan, MS&AD, Daikin, SMFG, Mitsubishi Chemical, Fujitsu, Marubeni, Asahi Chemical, Asahi Breweries, Mitsubishi Heavy and Denso.

    By contrast, the largest declared donations in money and “in kind” by Japanese companies in the UK are Toyota who donated £1.3m, Dentsu who donated £900,000 (but this might be across the global network) and Ricoh who donated £500m. None of these appear in Toyo Keizai’s rankings.

    Honda of the UK donated £24,000 to charities in the UK last year as well as investing in various sustainability initiatives in education and community, safety, environment and diversity and inclusion.

    Fujitsu was also a top 50 donor in the UK, along with MS Amlin (part of MS&AD), Sony Music Entertainment and Sony Interactive Entertainment, Mitsubishi Corp via its subsidiary Princes and Eisai.

    As for the other big donors in Japan who don’t seem to be giving much in the UK, it’s either because they are but not reporting it, or it’s an opportunity for their employees to encourage them to contribute to UK CSR activities as well as in Japan.

    *Toyo Keizai counts both direct contribution to CSR and business activities which have a social purpose.

  • Top 30 Japanese employers in Germany in 2021 compared to the UK

    Top 30 Japanese employers in Germany in 2021 compared to the UK

    Germany and the UK are host to a similar number of Japanese companies, and a similar number of people are employed by Japanese companies in both countries. Comparing the 30 largest employers in each country reveals some significant differences however, reflecting their different strengths in services and manufacturing,

    The top 30 largest Japanese employers in Germany employ around 99,000 people* – 57% of the total 167,000 people we estimate work for around 970 Japan owned companies in Germany. The UK top 30 employ around 94,000 people, just over half of the 180,000 people we estimate work for over 1100 Japan owned companies in the UK.

    So there’s not that much difference in the scale or proportion, however only 12 companies appear both in the Germany and UK Top 30.  They are largely the ICT/electronics companies such as Fujitsu, Sony, Ricoh, Canon, Panasonic, Konica Minolta, NTT and NTT Data, who presumably are at a scale which reflects population size and therefore domestic consumer and B2B demand for their products and services.

    Outsourcing Inc is in the Top 30 of both, following a recent aggressive programme of acquisitions throughout Europe such such as acquiring Otto Workforce. Similarly NSG appears in both Top 30s as a result of its acquisition of Pilkington Glass in 2006 and Olympus as a result of building on its acquisitions of Keymed and Winter & Ibe several decades ago.

    Hitachi only just makes it into the Top 30 for Germany, whereas it is number 2 in the UK, largely thanks to the organic expansion and acquisitions by Hitachi Rail.

    The companies that only appear in the UK Top 30 are either in the automotive sector such as Nissan and Honda, in the financial services sector (MS&AD, MUFG, Nomura, SMFG) or the general trading companies and their acquisitions (Itochu, Mitsubishi Corporation, Marubeni). Toyota appears in both Top 30s, although it only has manufacturing in the UK. In Germany its main companies are Toyota Kreditbank and Toyota Gazoo Racing. Dentsu, the advertising agency, is also in the UK Top 30, reflecting the traditional strength of the UK in marketing services, leading to the acquisition of Aegis and many other British agencies and resulting in Dentsu’s global headquarters being located in London.

    The companies that only appear in the Germany Top 30 are Sumitomo Electric, which is at number 1 due to the large numbers employed at its factories acquired from Volkswagen and Siemens in 2006, DMG Mori Seiki (another manufacturing acquisition), Lixil (acquired Grohe), JT International (its German factory a legacy of RJ Reynolds owning Hans Neueberg, in turn acquired by JT International), Showa Denko (owns SGL Carbon), and other companies with manufacturing in sectors of traditional strength for Germany such as chemicals, pharmaceuticals and engineering.

    So in a way, the UK hosting (at least until July 2021) manufacturing plants for the three major Japanese car brands is more of an anomaly, and the rest of the Japanese investment in the UK reflects the UK’s strengths in services, particularly financial and commercial, as a centre of international trade, whereas Japanese investment in Germany reflects traditional German manufacturing and engineering strengths.

    You can download the Top 30 Japanese companies in Germany and in the UK for free below:

    The Top 30 is by corporate grouping, so each entry will contain several Japanese companies.  In Germany’s case, there are 186 companies in the Top 30 employers. If you would like more detail on which companies appear in each group, their size in terms of employees and their location, please contact us. Prices start from 10c per company, with a 100 euro set up fee.

    FREE PDF DOWNLOAD OF TOP 30 JAPANESE EMPLOYERS IN UK 2021

    For the 2022 Top 30 Japanese companies in Germany, please see this post.

    *This post and the Top 30 Japanese companies in Germany was updated on 25th April 2021.

     

More posts