Pernille Rudlin - Rudlin Consulting

About Pernille Rudlin

Pernille Rudlin was brought up partly in Japan and partly in the UK. She is fluent in Japanese, and lived in Japan for 9 years.

She spent nearly a decade at Mitsubishi Corporation working in their London operations and Tokyo headquarters in sales and marketing and corporate planning and also including a stint in their International Human Resource Development Office.

More recently she had a global senior role as Director of External Relations, International Business, at Fujitsu, the leading Japanese information and communication technology company and the biggest Japanese employer in the UK, focusing on ensuring the company’s corporate messages in Japan reach the world outside.

Pernille Rudlin holds a B.A. with honours from Oxford University in Modern History and Economics and an M.B.A. from INSEAD and she is the author of several books and articles on cross cultural communications and business.

Since starting Japan Intercultural Consulting’s operations in Europe in 2004, Pernille has conducted seminars for Japanese and European companies in Belgium, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Switzerland, UAE, the UK and the USA, on Japanese cultural topics, post merger integration and on working with different European cultures.

Pernille is a non-executive director of Japan House London, an Associate of the Centre for Japanese Studies at the University of East Anglia and she is also a trustee of the Japan Society of the UK.

Find more about me on:

Here are my most recent posts

What to do with the window gazing tribe

I visited Japan for the first time in a year and a half at the end of last year. I try to go to Japan once a year, each time looking out for subtle changes in a country I have been visiting or living in for the past forty years.

This time I felt some of the “genki” (a useful Japanese word meaning energy and health) had come back, compared to visits in 2011 and 2012 when there seemed to be a general atmosphere of depression.

However I also felt Tokyo had slowed down. There were visibly more elderly people, but also the younger people moved more slowly, partly as they were gazing into their smartphones as they walked.

Japan’s “yasashisa” (gentleness) and rich cultural life make it a great place to grow old. Of course I realise that it is the current generation of retirees who have it the best – a decent pension and healthier, longer lives in which to enjoy it.

My generation, both in Japan and many European countries, face the prospect of not being able to retire until we are 70. So we have at least another 20 years of working life ahead of us. In Europe it is now illegal for employers to discriminate on the grounds of age, and the default retirement age of 65 has been phased out in the UK.

Europeans reaching their fifties will not be able to afford to retire early as previously. But if they cling on to their jobs they are made to feel like they are blocking the way for younger people and are vulnerable to redundancy programmes.

It is hard to get a job in another company once you are over fifty – and there is also a question of motivation. The prospect of another 20 years doing the same thing – particularly if it is a “gemba” (shopfloor) type, active, high pressure job, is not appealing. The second half of a working life should be more about reflecting on acquired knowledge and skills and handing them on to the next generation.

I’m not sure the initiatives taken in Japan since the 1990s to deal with this – such as kata tataki (literally “shoulder tapping” where employees in their late 40s are forcefully offered very early retirement) and madogiwazoku (the window tribe – people who have been given a seat by the window and no real job to do) really worked. It was not only disheartening for those directly impacted, but also for the younger generation, who have reacted by becoming more risk averse. They want lifetime employment, but don’t see the point of being ambitious or taking risks such as working abroad.

A better way might be to help people in the second half of their working life find ways of capturing their accumulated knowledge and skills and transmitting them to the younger generation in Japan – through teaching rather than as a manager.

Locally hired employees and managers in overseas acquisitions would also welcome having an appointed mentor to help them feel more connected to Japan headquarters and understand the corporate culture and processes. If Japan could refresh its traditions of sempai/kohai (mentoring of juniors by seniors) and apprenticeship for the 21st century, I believe it could be a pioneer in developing a humane but productive ageing society.

This article by Pernille Rudlin originally appeared in the Teikoku Databank News in Japanese on February 12th 2014 and also appears in Pernille Rudlin’s new book “Shinrai: Japanese Corporate Integrity in a Disintegrating Europe” – available as a paperback and Kindle ebook on Amazon.

For more content like this, subscribe to the free Rudlin Consulting Newsletter. 最新の在欧日系企業の状況については無料の月刊Rudlin Consulting ニューズレターにご登録ください。

Marketing Japan to attract foreign investment – a fourth arrow?

Prime Minister Abe made a short, punchy speech at the “Invest in Japan” event I attended yesterday in London. Perhaps not quite as passionate as his longer speech at the Guildhall last year, but his key message was clear, that Foreign Direct Investment was an important pillar of his growth strategy and that he was aiming, with Abenomics, to make Japan a more market friendly, more exciting destination for foreign companies.

The current fashion is to say that Abenomics is losing steam, because of the lack of progress with what Abe has termed the third arrow – deregulation and structural reform. My view on this is that the Japanese government can deregulate and pass new, more liberal laws all it likes, but without significant support and action from major Japanese companies, not much will happen.

So foreign investment might be a way to stimulate action and change, if foreign competition is able to enter the Japanese market more aggressively. There is something of a chicken and egg situation, however, in that foreign investors often say they need to see deregulation and structural reform implemented before they will invest in Japan.

There is also a concern, voiced by ex ambassador Sir David Wright at the event, that foreign companies are still seen as “foreign” and may not get equal access to the benefits of any reforms or incentives. The mayor of Kobe was quick to pick up on this point – “foreign companies in Kobe will be seen as Kobe companies” he said, which is no doubt a legacy of Kobe’s long standing history as an international port. Certainly we felt very at ease when we lived in Kobe, as long ago as the 1970s, despite not being members of the rather snobby expat Kobe Club.

So Abe gave concrete examples of where there had been deregulation, in the energy sector and pharmaceutical sectors and also a strengthening of corporate governance, based on British standards. The rest of the morning was given over to presentations by the mayors of Fukuoka and Kobe, and the governors of Mie and Hiroshima prefectures, who were keen to emphasise another area of reform – the new national strategic special zones, where regulations will have a lighter touch, to enable innovation.

It seems Japan’s mayors and governors have more autonomy than in the UK, so many of them were able to showcase particular initiatives and tax breaks they had introduced to encourage investment into their regions. I had been dreading these presentations, expecting a succession of grey men explaining word for word, dreary, text box heavy powerpoint slides in incomprehensible or badly interpreted English, but to the audience’s great delight, the 4 regional leaders wowed us all with their youthful energy, dynamism and sometimes excellent, but always bravely and strongly delivered English, which seemed to come from the heart rather than a script written by someone else.

These men (there was supposed to be one woman too, the mayor of Yokohama, but she was unwell) could be Abe’s fourth arrow – if they can make a convincing case for a Japan as an Asian hub, beyond the bureacracy and vested interests of Tokyo – but I think a bit more strategic thinking behind the marketing is needed. Some sectors in the UK are already aware of Japan’s potential – I was delighted to see Paul Alger of the UK Fashion and Textile Association steer Hawick Knitwear towards Japan as a basis for entry into China, in the recent BBC programme The New Troubleshooter.

The Fukuoka mayor got some way there, with his eyecatching map showing that Fukuoka was equidistant to Shanghai, Seoul and Tokyo. Not to mention the fact that KLM has just started flights from Amsterdam to Fukuoka – a point that caught my attention, as we are about to move to Norwich, and I am looking forward to using Norwich International (sic) Airport to get to Japan, as it has several KLM flights to Amsterdam a day.

There was rather too much emphasis on the nice lifestyle to be had in Japan’s cities (and it made me very nostalgic for the lovely times I had living in Hiroshima and Kobe) and not quite enough hard headed business appeal, particularly along the lines of the point that Steve Crane, of Business Link Japan, made in the final presentation of the day, that it is important to move near your ecosystem and supply chain, when considering location.

The leaders did note the various industries or specialist zones that they were focusing on regionally, but it’s possible that they took it too much for granted that we would understand how industrial clustering works in Japan. Actually, as most of the audience were the usual Japan gang, this kind of marketing would have been wasted on us anyway.

Which brings me to my biggest constructive criticism – the government bodies that organised this seminar, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Embassy of Japan in the UK, the Japan Local Government Centre and JETRO, really need to network more with the various regions, cities and companies in the UK, so that more representatives of UK companies come to these seminars. JETRO is apparently about to hire some industry sector specialists in Europe as consultants – I presume to help with that. The JLGC head told me that twinning Japanese cities with regional governments in the UK has proved difficult, as no British politician or bureaucrat in this current climate of austerity wants to be seen to be jetting off to Japan on a sushi and sake junket.

As Sir David Warren, former ambassador to Japan, succinctly put it, “it needs to be proved that Japan can be more than a profitable niche”.

EMEA CEMEA EMEIA – Japanese regional headquarters in Europe – scope and location

My old employer Fujitsu’s latest attempt to resolve the “European regional headquarters” conundrum that many multinationals face is to create a region called EMEIA – Europe, Middle East, India and Africa. This is partly a reflection of the IT industry (having large outsourcing desktop support operations in India, which in Fujitsu’s case had actually been managed out of the USA operation previously) and also the legacy of the former Fujitsu Siemens global HQ in Germany selling hardware into India.

The EMEIA region will be headed up by Duncan Tait, CEO of Fujitsu UK & Ireland, who has also been made Corporate Senior Vice President in Fujitsu HQ’s new global matrix structure, so this represents a tipping of power back to the UK, having tipped over to Germany previously, with the previous tripartite European structure of C(ontinental) EMEA, UK & Ireland and the Nordics.

I had mentioned previously that there seemed to be a shift towards Japanese companies basing their European or EMEA headquarters in the UK. Some say this could be due to the relative tax structures in the UK being more favourable now than the Netherlands or Germany. My view is that Japanese companies are not quite as hard headed as that, and it is more to do with the favourable business climate (diverse, flexible workforce) and global infrastructure and support services that the UK offers.

I have big worries, therefore, on how any British exit from the EU might ultimately impact Japan’s investment in the UK. UKIP leader Nigel Farage and the Labour Party’s shadow chancellor Ed Balls recently had an exchange on this, with Farage (rightly alas) pointing out that Nissan were very negative on the impact of the UK not joining the euro and yet their factory is still in Sunderland.

For sure, Nissan will not be closing that factory down any time soon – it’s too efficient and the UK market is too important for that. But what I would be worried about if I was in government would be the more hidden ripple effect of headquarter location. It is true for all industries, not just the automotive industry, that the location of a major company’s regional headquarters will also affect its procurement, marketing, financing behaviours and therefore the suppliers around it. Furthermore, the roles needed to run these consolidated functions are the most senior and well paid jobs in an organisation. The economic impact is therefore not just about the size of the directly employed workforce in a factory. If the UK were no longer in the EU, I wonder whether we might not see a slow drift of headquarter functions, and supporting services and people, back to Germany or the Netherlands or Belgium.

Nissan’s European HQ is actually in Switzerland – unusually for a Japanese company – 18 out of the Top 30 Japanese employers in Europe have their regional headquarters or part of their regional headquarters in the UK. Official location may be only half the story however – I know that many Japanese companies are moving towards a more “virtual” regional structure, with top jobs and functions located across Europe. I will examine this further in future postings.

Wally Olins CBE 1930-2014

I was very sorry to hear of the death of Wally Olins on Monday. Although he was 83, and had recently undergone an operation, it seemed he was recovering well, and I was looking forward to his postponed book launch for Brand New: The Shape of Brands to Come and maybe catching up with him before then as he had said he had wanted to chat further with me about Japan – which was typical of Wally, that despite his immense expertise and experience, he was always curious to know more and very generous and open to relative newcomers to his field.

We had worked together both when I was at Fujitsu for their new brand promise “shaping tomorrow with you” and after that with his company Saffron on another corporate vision project for a Japanese owned subsidiary. As Ian Stephens, principal of Saffron, has said in their statement about his death, Wally was infectiously charming but also famously impatient – he sometimes sought reassurance from me that his straight talking style was not going to upset Japanese executives.

Although he was impatient with Japanese companies’ caution, indecisiveness and inarticulacy, I sensed Wally was approving of Japanese companies because they instinctively “get” (and had been practicing, at least in Japan) the concept he had been preaching, that a company’s brand is about nurturing its collective identity, giving it an emotional connection to its customers.

I understand his impatience now, as he did seem, despite his four score years and more, like a man who still had a lot more he wanted to give and achieve. The best compliment we can pay him therefore is to buy his new book, and keep the flag flying for his work and ideas.

6 reasons Japan is behind as a global brand

Prof Noboru Sato, of Nagoya University and formerly of Honda Motors and Samsung gave the following 6 reasons (article in Japanese) that Japan is behind, not only in the globalization of business, but in terms of global cultural influence – in the arts and sports and also the strength of “Brand Japan”. Many will come as no surprise to Japan watchers:

1. Education

Fewer Japanese students are studying abroad and Japanese universities are slow in increasing the number of foreign academics they hire. As Sato acknowledges, Japanese universities need to make their academic staffing more meritocratic if they want to attract the best in the world.

2. Young Japanese not working abroad

Sato points to how Japanese companies have not been proactive in hiring “returnees” – Japanese graduates who have spent part of their education overseas. However, and I would concur, he acknowledges this has changed recently, and many companies have been taking steps to hire foreign employees and returnees in Japan. But, as Sato points out, Japanese companies do not make any distinction in terms of pay or promotion prospects for people who have Masters degrees. This makes them an unattractive prospect for returnees and foreign graduates.

3. Uncompetitive education

Although Japan has very high literacy and numeracy rates, its educational spending as a proportion of GDP is one of the lowest in the world. In other words parents in Japan are footing the bill. Computer literacy is lower than most developed countries.

4. Industry’s lack of global competitiveness

All the famous names in electronics have been suffering recently – however Sato sees some grounds for optimism that they may regain their strength.

5. The penetration of Japanese food culture

Sato gives the first 4 reasons a fairly cursory explanation but really goes to town on this one – he’s clearly had one too many bad “Japanese” meals abroad. In Sato’s view, the “fake” Japanese restaurants, run by non-Japanese, in Europe, North America and South Korea, are ruining the Japan brand, as are the recent scandals in Japan’s own restaurants and department stores, where lower grade foods were passed off as higher grade, or wrongly stated to be from specific regions.

6. Tourism

Japan ranks #33 in the world for tourist numbers, and South Korea, with half the population of Japan, ranks 23rd. Japan should be attracting more tourists given the richness of its culture and food.

Sato concludes that much of this could be solved if there was more sense of a need for competitiveness, from primary education onwards, in Japan. There needs to be more external stimulus and awareness of the need to be competitive relative to other countries. He does not give any concrete proposals on how this is to be achieved, however. In a sense Japan has got itself in a virtuous (or vicious) circle, in that it has become one of the nicest places to live in the world, so why would Japanese people feel any sense of urgency to compete with or live in other countries, which seem more dangerous and insecure – and as for the food…

Hitachi’s new President, Toshiaki Higashihara Q&A

As blogged previously, Hitachi announced their new President and COO Toshiaki Higashihara, on January 8th. The Nikkei Business magazine’s Q&A with him in the 20th January edition asked him for his views on how Hitachi was going to grow, and what would change.

Higashihara emphasised “One Hitachi”, bringing together services, products and solutions to address customer needs such as energy saving and improving productivity. The differentiator for Hitachi against Siemens and GE being that in the infrastructure business, Hitachi can also bring ICT skills and solutions around cloud computing and big data.

A sense of speed is needed, he added, and this means that not all decisions should be made in Tokyo headquarters. R&D, purchasing and ICT systems should be looked at in a global context. He also made positive noises about further acquisitions.

What will remain constant is Hitachi’s 100 years of “monozukuri” (making things/craftsmanship) and SQDC: Safety, Quality, Delivery Time and Cost.

It seems Higashihara was close to current President Nakanishi (who becomes Chairman and CEO), as a kohai (protege) and also brings global experience – a masters’ degree in computer science from Boston University and was President of Hitachi Power Europe.

First non-Japanese CEO in Takeda’s 230 year history

Takeda, Asia’s largest pharmaceutical company, caused a sensation in November when it announced that it intended to appoint Christophe Weber, a French 47 year old outsider from GlaxoSmithKline, as its next CEO, subject to board approval. Not only is he not Japanese, but he is much younger than the average Japanese President, and he is the 20 year old veteran of another rival company.

He was not unknown to Takeda however, as he was key member in the collaboration between Takeda and GSK on a vaccine joint venture. However, when I discussed this appointment with the President of a Japanese start up company in the same healthcare sector he was not impressed – “a paucity of management” on the current CEO Yasukichi Hasegawa’s part, he harrumphed.

Hasegawa himself had been appointed by Kunio Takeda, scion of the founding family, in 2003, with Takeda stating “I’ve reached the limit of what I can do to globalize the company”. Hasegawa took up the baton, acquiring US cancer R&D company Millennium Pharmaceutical in 2008 and Swiss biotech company Nycomed in 2011. He tried to retain many of Millennium’s executives such as CEO Deborah Dunsire, who also joined Takeda’s unusually “diverse” board which includes Japanese American “Tachi” Yamada, President of Global Health at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Frank Morich, ex Bayer. However she resigned in 2013 as a result of the restructuring that Hasegawa pushed through, to integrate Millennium more fully into Takeda and streamline operations.

Apparently, a couple of years’ ago, Hasegawa said he wanted to have a Japanese person succeed him. He felt that diversifying the structure and bringing in non-Japanese was going to take time to show results, and he would have to pass the baton on before then.

Although my healthcare industry CEO used “paucity” to describe Hasegawa’s management capability, it seems from this that there is a paucity of internationally capable management within the Takeda home country organisation to carry on and support the bold moves that are being made – a situation many globalizing Japanese companies are facing.

5 conditions for successful Japanese cross border M&A

SoftBank’s acquisition of Finnish mobile games maker Supercell in 2013 for $1.5bn did not grab the headlines to the extent its $21.6bn acquisition of Sprint did, but Nikkei Business in its December series on cross border M&A points to it as evidence of the final characteristic necessary for successful acquisitions – “animal spirits” – a hunger for growth with the acquisition showing the direction in which Masayoshi Son wants to take the company.

The Nikkei Business magazine goes on to conclude the series with “Five Conditions for Success” in cross border M&As:

1. Do not go near M&As without a concrete and detailed management strategy for what will happen after the merger

2. Set up a specialist team within the company, which investigates target companies and draws up shortlists

3. Be very strict on the contents of the agreement. It will be vital when unforeseen problems occur after the acquisition.

4. For cross border acquisitions, the key is to motivate the management team in the acquired company. However a proper agreement must be put in place regarding switching to other companies and performance based compensation.

5. Make preparations in advance for all kinds of scenarios. Although it’s hard to predict events like the Lehman shock, preparations will help with coping with change.

I would add a few to that. For example, whilst it might be best to take some time before making radical changes to the acquired company, symbolic changes such as taking the parent company name relatively early on help focus the two companies on “what is different now” and “what we have in common” and stop both companies from sliding back into their pre merger habits, with the acquired company feeling neglected and directionless.

Try to bring the acquired company executives into the HQ fold as soon as possible. Even though it’s best to delegate to them the authority they are used to, it’s also important for them to understand how to socialise their proposals through nemawashi with their peers in the headquarters. Actually moving to Japan seems to have been a step too far for many non-Japanese executives, but frequent business trips should be encouraged and supported. Perhaps even a mentor could be appointed.

Finally, as the Nikkei Business itself points out, it’s actually the Japan HQ that needs to change if their acquisitons are to succeed.

If you are being acquired by a Japanese company, you may be interested in Japan Intercultural Consulting’s (represented by Rudlin Consulting in EMEA) post merger integration services.

Successes of cross border M&A #6 – Terumo

When Terumo, Japan’s biggest medical device maker bought CaridianBCT from Gambro AB for $2.63bn in 2011, it was expected that the head of Terumo’s BCT unit, Hiroshi Nagumo, would take over as CEO of the new Terumo BCT company. However Nagumo decided to appoint the CEO of CaridianBCT, David Perez, as CEO instead, with Nagumo reporting into him as SVP and GM for Japan. Perezalso became an executive officer on Terumo’s main board and the headquarters of Terumo’s blood management unit was moved to CaridianBCT’s base in Colorado.

Nagumo says he made himself “Number Two” after objectively considering whether he could really perform as “Number One”. At the time Terumo’s total turnover was Y328bn,of which the blood management unit represented around Y25bn. CaridianBCT’s turnover was double that at around Y50bn. A third of the combined company’s sales were to the USA, and around 20% to Japan.

“When I thought about appointing myself as the CEO, and leaving the headquarters in Japan, I realised that I would always end up thinking about the customers that I had known the longest, the doctors in Japan” and that this would be counter to the objective of the acquisition, which was to develop new products and expand market share globally.

In 2012, the sales of the combined company’s blood management business actually fell in Japan, but thanks to growth overseas, the total turnover rose 4.1%.

As Nikkei Business points out in their series on cross border M&A last month, in the past when Japanese multinationals acquired companies overeas, they tended to send in Japanese managers to run them, but this does not work so well if, as in this case, the acquired company is larger than the acquiring company’s own business in that sector. It can lead to the demotivation of the staff in the acquired company and loss of customers.

However Terumo did reshuffle the management, and had a strong sense of how they wanted to proceed after the acquisition. Nagumo had been preparing a project called “Unite” from a year before the acquisition – it aimed to integrate sales, customer service and logistics across the two companies. Terumo fitted itself to CaridianBCT’s structures, except in Asia, where Terumo was stronger than Caridian, so a different structure, where Terumo’s operations there became TerumoBCT’s representative dealers.

It took a year to discuss, and then in 2012 it was announced as a one “fell swoop” integration – “we did not want to take so long that customers became confused” says Nagumo.

Production is taking longer to integrate. Decisions have to be made about what products will be made in the factories in the USA, Japan and Northern Ireland. On the other hand, Terumo’s quality control management has been introduced into Caridian’s operations already. As a result, claims have dropped to a quarter of the level before the acquisition.

Not everything went smoothly – Perez was amazed at the number of meetings deemed necessary by Terumo before a decision was made. At the same time, Terumo was puzzled as to when a decision was made, when it had not been properly “socialised” within the company. “A certain amount of time has to be allowed to understand what is different, culturally”, says Nagumo. In 2013, former Terumo staff will be posted long term to the USA and in 2014, former Caridian staff will be posted to the Japan office.

As a result of the success of the BCT business, Terumo has also moved its artificial heart business to the USA, a unit it purchased from 3M in 1990. As the Nikkei comments – it’s a nice illustration of how to make sure a post merger management structure fits market and customer needs.

If you are being acquired by a Japanese company, you may be interested in Japan Intercultural Consulting’s (represented by Rudlin Consulting in EMEA) post merger integration services.

Japan’s M&A boom – a way of forcing globalization?

I was reading the last chapter of a book (The 1990s and beyond (pdf)) I wrote which was published in 2000 about the history of Mitsubishi Corporation in London, and was reminded that I had come up with a concept of “forced globalization” to describe what Japanese companies might need to do to truly globalize, based on their experiences up to the 1990s. Much of what I said still holds true, but what I had not anticipated was the surge in cross border acquisitions by Japanese companies as another route into globalization these past ten years.

My view then was that Japanese companies will not “naturally” globalize, in a business-led pursuit of profitable growth, because of the “representing Japan” mindset of companies such as Mitsubishi Corporation, and the fact that so much knowledge creation and business creation is in Japanese and the Japanese staff feel most comfortable with keeping it that way.

I proposed that human resource-led “forced” globalization – starting with globalizing the management, might be the only way to break the mould.The graphic I produced to illustrate this is not in the pdf, so I have reproduced it here:

“Natural” globalization:

“Forced” globalization:

I was imagining Japanese companies would continue doing what we attempted at Mitsubishi Corporation in the 1990s, which was to hire and develop more non-Japanese people, in the hope that they would then create more global business. This strategy still continues for many Japanese companies, but as I predicted, takes time, and often the non-Japanese employees quit before it bears fruit, through frustration.

Acquiring an overseas company is an instant way to globalize the business, and in theory should instantly globalize the management. But as described in previous posts, often the overseas managers are kept at an arm’s length.

The bottom line from all of this, which has not changed at all in the past decades, is that Japanese companies will only do what the Japanese employees of that company see the need to do. The majority of Japanese employees are not likely to want to become global themselves – it is too far out of their comfort zone. Nor do they want to bring non-Japanese into their circles as this would be a threat to their own careers and status in the company. Nor do they want to be actively involved in the management of the overseas subsidiaries – the risks of being associated with any failure are too great.

The constructive message of this, however, is it is therefore up to the employees and management of the acquired company to take the initiative and ask to integrate with the Japan parent – just as the Brazilian employees and managers at Schincariol asked Kirin to change the company name to Brazil Kirin. Japanese executives are familiar and happy with complying with requests that come from “bottom up” and represent the consensus views of a group of employees.