Rudlin Consulting Rudlin Consulting
  • About
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Clients
  • Publications
  • Contact us
  • Privacy
  • English
  • About
  • Services
  • Blog
  • Clients
  • Publications
  • Contact us
  • Privacy
  • English
  •  

Brexit

Home / Archive by Category "Brexit"

Category: Brexit

Japanese financial services in the UK and EMEA

The UK’s financial regulatory authority has announced further plans to ease the rules for banks and insurers in the UK. This is in line with both previous and current British government policy of putting more emphasis on growth and investment over concerns about safety and risk.

It is also part of trying to find a benefit to Brexit, now that the UK does not need to comply with EU rules. Reducing the regulatory burden might free up resources for Japanese financial services companies to invest in innovation, or support their clients’ investment in infrastructure and zero carbon projects in the EMEA region.

Japanese financial services capital has flowed out of the UK into Ireland, Luxembourg and the Netherlands

Although Japanese financial services companies have maintained the scale of their presence in the UK since Brexit in terms of employee numbers, Japanese capital has flowed out of the UK financial services sector over the past few years. There have been inflows of Japanese financial services investment into Ireland, Luxembourg and the Netherlands.* The former is undoubtedly related to the large number of Japanese aircraft leasing companies in Ireland, attracted by the beneficial taxation regime. Luxembourg is host to many Japan owned investment funds and the regional headquarters of the major Japanese insurers.

Amsterdam the post Brexit choice for EU regional HQ

As for the flow of Japanese capital to the Netherlands, this is due to the pull of Japanese corporate customers having moved their regional headquarters there, after Brexit. As EU regulations insist that financial services firms have substantial capital and key decision makers in the European Union, many Japanese banks therefore chose Amsterdam for their EU regional headquarters too.

There are now around 10,000 Japanese nationals in the Netherlands – a 50% increase on a decade ago. The key decision makers at Japanese financial services firms in the region are not all Japanese however. Often the EU subsidiary reports into a UK based EMEA holding company and both the EU and UK boards of those companies have a majority of European directors.

Universal banking leading to restructuring in EMEA

Japanese banks have undertaken substantial restructuring in the region, merging their securities business into the banking side, to become universal banks. This has also resulted in the UK becoming host to corporate function services for the whole region.

It’s clear that London continues to have an attraction as a global financial centre in terms of a large and specialist labour pool and infrastructure, as well as a place to innovate. A loosening of regulations compared to the EU’s more stringent regime will strengthen this appeal.

*data taken from https://www.mof.go.jp/english/policy/international_policy/reference/balance_of_payments/ebpfdii.htm

This article originally appeared in Japanese in the Teikoku Databank News on 12 March 2025

For more content like this, subscribe to the free Rudlin Consulting Newsletter. 最新の在欧日系企業の状況については無料の月刊Rudlin Consulting ニューズレターにご登録ください。

Share Button
Read More
The puzzle of Japanese foreign direct investment in the UK

Something has been puzzling me for a few years about Japanese foreign investment in the UK. The net investment by Japanese companies in the British “communications” sector since 2016 is US$55bn, over three times more than the next largest net investment, which was in the food manufacturing sector.

chart showing Japanese foreign direct investment by sector in the UK

There have been various acquisitions and investments over the past few years in British food manufacturers that I am aware of; Zensho acquiring Taiko Foods and Yo! Sushi, Mizkan acquiring various British food brands and factories for Branston, Haywards and Sarsons, Calbee acquiring Seabrook Crisps and various acquisitions in fish processing.

But what Japanese “communications” companies could have invested billions in the UK? The Japanese term used by the Ministry of Finance for the communications sector is 通信業 (tsuushingyou) and the main players in Japan in this sector (perhaps in the UK we would use the term telecommunications) are considered to be NTT, KDDI and SoftBank. NTT and KDDI have been investing in data centers in the UK in recent years, and NTT placed its global non-Japan HQ in London, but surely this would not have cost tens of billions. Which leaves SoftBank.

SoftBank spent US$6.5bn on acquiring ARM in 2016, which may account for the amount shown in 2017. But what about the $10bns thereafter, and the large withdrawal of over US$20bn in 2020? I am guessing this must be money moving in and out of SoftBank’s Vision Fund, which is headquartered in London and managed by SoftBank Investment Advisers.

Another puzzle is what is going on in the services sector – US$33bn was invested in Britain 2016 and then a disinvestment of US$32bn in 2018, leaving a net investment of only US$661m. “Services” is a very large umbrella, and may have covered the shifting of European logistics, warehousing and headquarter services functions out of the UK and the capital to go with it, to the EU in preparation for Brexit.

There were disinvestments in the finance and insurance sector in 2018, 2019 and 2022 but overall a net investment of US$6.7bn. Judging by the dates, the net positive total is “despite” Brexit and the Truss budget.

Transportation equipment manufacturing, which would include car manufacturing saw a few instances of disinvestment, primarily related to Honda closing Swindon in 2021 and some of its suppliers shutting up shop in the UK. Overall, despite some tough years, the sector is $3bn in the black, in terms of net investment since 2016, helped by a $2bn investment in 2024. Japanese net investment in almost all other sectors apart from services has outstripped this, however.

For comparison, the charts for the main investments in Germany and the Netherlands are given below:

Chart showing Japanese FDI into Germany 2016 to 2024 chart showing Japanese FDI into the Netherlands 2016 to 2024

Comparing by sector, in finance and insurance, the Netherlands has yet again been the clear beneficiary of Brexit, receiving around US$21bn in net investment, with Germany receiving around around US$9bn, compared to US$6.7bn for the UK.

For transportation equipment manufacturing, Germany is the clear winner with US$9.5bn net investment 2016-2024, compared to US$3.7bn to the UK and US$1.75bn to the Netherlands – even though Germany does not host any Japanese OEM car manufacturing.

The investment by Japanese companies into the UK “communications” sector at US$55bn dwarfs the US$2.8bn invested in the Netherlands and US$1.5bn invested in Germany – which does reinforce the view that this is a SoftBank Vision Fund driven figure, rather than any actual investment in the British telecommunications infrastructure. You might have expected to see comparable investments from NTT in Germany and the Netherlands if it had been a business decision rather than an investment fund decision.

Overall, the comparative advantages in trade and investment between the three economies, in Japanese eyes is clear – Britain – digital, services and communications (despite the SoftBank reality distortion effect), Germany – automotive and chemical related manufacturing and corporate banking and the Netherlands – continuing to be strong in food manufacturing, but now also seen as an EU base for financial services headquarters – effective from a tax perspective, but not needing as many employees as manufacturing.

For further insights on Japanese foreign direct investment in the UK and EMEA financial services sector, our Japanese Financial Services in the UK and EMEA 2025 report and directory can be purchased and downloaded here. 

For more content like this, subscribe to the free Rudlin Consulting Newsletter. 最新の在欧日系企業の状況については無料の月刊Rudlin Consulting ニューズレターにご登録ください。

Share Button
Read More
What is a Japanese company anyway?

One of many jobs I did not get over the years was a board position for an investment trust focused on Japan. In the “any other questions for us?” bit at the end, I raised the issue of “how do you define a Japanese company? Is it enough just to say it is listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange? Or headquartered in Japan?” In retrospect, a foolish question to ask at that point and the chair simply shut me down and said that was a topic for debate for another day. Which of course never happened. And a  year or two after that interview, I had a certain amount of schadenfreude watching the fund’s Net Asset Value take a dive.

Is SoftBank?

What triggered that question was that the fund had made a lot of money over the years investing in SoftBank, which is listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange and is headquartered in Japan, but to my mind, not really a Japanese company. This is not some racist point about the founder, Masayoshi Son, being ethnically Korean.  More that, as an investor, rather than just simply thinking of your portfolio as a series of aggregated regional or national risks, with each regional or national economy moving in a particular direction and counterbalancing each other, in the case of Japanese companies, another risk to consider might be the particular way that traditional Japanese companies behave and whether the fund is investing in those traditional Japanese companies, or emerging ones.

Nissan – run by a Mexican, using Chinese batteries, manufactured in the UK for sale to the US?

Even some of those traditional Japanese companies are no longer owned by Japanese shareholders. I was reminded of this by the recent coverage in the UK of the British government contributing a substantial part of the £1bn funding for an AESC electric vehicle battery factory to be built in Sunderland, to supply Nissan. AESC is described as “Japan-owned” but actually the controlling majority of shares is owned by Envision, a Shanghai based company. AESC’s headquarters are in Japan, however, and Nissan still owns some shares in it.

That this news came a day after the announcement of a UK-US trade deal which will (if signed) dramatically reduce tariffs on UK cars being exported to the USA does not seem a coincidence – even though some commentators say this scanty deal was rushed through so as to be announced in time for the 80th anniversary VE day.

Another announcement the UK government might have wanted to synchronise with was the leaked news that that the new, Mexican CEO of Nissan will announce tomorrow (13th May) plans to cut 20,000 jobs worldwide. Looking at the capacity utilisation and sales data for Nissan, Japan, the USA and China look likely to bear the brunt of this. Production has already ended in Argentina and India. Nissan will also announce that it is not going ahead with building a battery factory in Japan. So, using the Sunderland plant and the AESC factory for batteries for the new Leaf, and exporting to the USA looks like a plausible plan now and one that the UK government is presumably also happy to back.

Other Nissan suppliers, traditionally Japanese, are also now foreign owned, depending on how you classify this. Marelli (which used to be Calsonic Kansei in the UK) and Vantec (a logistics company) are both now owned by KKR Japan – the Japanese operation of the US owned private equity and investment company, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts.

Back to SoftBank again

If you look at our 30 largest Japan-owned companies in the UK, employing around 65,000 people, you’ll see some surprising names such as Kwik-Fit and The Fulham Shore (owners of The Real Greek and Franca Manca), which was acquired by Toridoll, who have other more obviously Japanese brands such as Marugame Udon.  Other companies such as Stapleton’s Tyre Services, the Financial Times, Micheldever Tyre Services, Building Design Partnership and Liberata are also all acquisitions by Japanese companies. And of course, ARM, which was acquired by SoftBank in 2016 An acquisition which, according to the British government at the time, showed Britain’s economy can be successful after leaving the EU. SoftBank then tried to sell ARM to Nvidia, and finally floated it in 2023 – on NASDAQ, rather than the London Stock Exchange.

 

 

For more content like this, subscribe to the free Rudlin Consulting Newsletter. 最新の在欧日系企業の状況については無料の月刊Rudlin Consulting ニューズレターにご登録ください。

Share Button
Read More
Australia overtakes China as second largest host of Japanese nationals living overseas

The headline in Japan on the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs latest data on Japanese nationals living overseas was that the number of Japanese living in China had dipped below 100,000 for the first time. This meant China was overtaken by Australia as the second largest host of Japanese nationals, below the USA, also for the first time.

map of world showing top 8 hosts of Japanese nationalsThe USA  is still overwhelmingly the largest host, with over 413,000 Japanese nationals living there on permanent or long term visas, but there has been a gentle decline in numbers since 2018. Similarly, the UK, which has the sixth largest number of Japanese nationals (just over 64,000) peaked in 2019 and is now around 1% down on 2016. Germany, #8, has 12% more Japanese residents than it had in 2016 – a similar growth rate to Australia, and looks to be catching up with Brazil, which has had a 13% decline in Japanese nationals.

It may seem odd that Brazil and the USA have so many Japanese nationals considering the major migrations from Japan to those countries were at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th century, but this is because in many cases, the Japanese nationals are actually third or even fourth generation. Japan does not allow dual nationality, and nationality  is determined by ‘jus sanguinis’ – at least one of the parents being Japanese, rather than being born in Japan. So many children of Japanese immigrants keep their parents’ nationality despite their birthplace. This is why the Ministry of Foreign Affairs data needs to be treated with caution. The data shows those Japanese who have registered with the embassy or consulate. Clearly, if you want your children to have Japanese nationality, despite being born overseas, you would need to register them. I suspect however, that many parents both register their children as Japanese nationals, but also enable their children to take the nationality of the country they were born in, if that is legally allowed – ‘jus soli’. Others may not register with the Embassy at all, to try to stay under the radar.

There would be no way for the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs to check whether there were conflicting nationalities being claimed, until something forces the issue, such as inheritance tax to be paid in Japan, a pandemic or a change in the immigration and nationalization laws in the host country.

Separating out the numbers for permanent residents and those on long term visas (who are likely to be corporate expatriates) reveals the impact of legal changes, the pandemic and also long term shifts in Japanese corporate expatriation and Japanese who commit to “burying their bones” as it is said in Japanese, in a foreign country – probably due to having married and raised families in that country.

The rise of the permanent resident

Chart showing trend lines of Japanese nationals in the UKIf current trends continue, the number of Japanese who are permanent residents in the UK is set to overtake the number who are in the UK temporarily on working visas by around 2026 – a function of both the decline in Japanese corporate expatriates and a steady increase in the number of Japanese choosing to live permanently in the UK.

The other major host countries (more than 10,000 Japanese nationals) where more than half the Japanese nationals are permanent residents are Argentina (96.7%), Brazil  (91.7%), Canada (67.9%) Australia (61.5%), New Zealand (60%), the USA (55.7%), Italy (55.1%) and Switzerland (65.7%).

A similar crossover of Japanese permanent residents exceeding long term visa holders may occur in Germany and France within the next 5 to 10 years if the trend is projected from 2012 – but the most recent data show that there has been a slight upturn in Japanese long term visa holders in both countries and a levelling off in the number of permanent residents.

 

Chart showing Japanese nationals in France 2012 to 2024chart showing Japanese nationals in Germany 2012 to 2024

Japanese nationals in Italy 2024Chart showing japanese nationals in Switzerland since 2012

Chart showing Japanese nationals in Netherlands 2012-2024

Except in the Netherlands, the Brexit benefitter

The outlier in Europe in many ways is the Netherlands. Although there only are just over 10,000 Japanese nationals living there, this represents a 53% increase on 2014. Judging by the steady rise of long term visa holding Japanese – particularly around the Brexit years, there is no sign of the gap closing between permanent and long term Japanese nationals in the Netherlands. As noted in our recent report on Japanese financial services in Europe, Japanese banks have followed their Japanese clients and reacted to Brexit by opening or reinforcing their regional headquarters in the Netherlands with assets and capital, and Japanese expatriates would seem to have followed.

Our 2025 report on Japanese Financial Services in the UK and EMEA, with a directory of 300 Japanese financial services companies in the region  – can be purchased and downloaded online here

 

For more content like this, subscribe to the free Rudlin Consulting Newsletter. 最新の在欧日系企業の状況については無料の月刊Rudlin Consulting ニューズレターにご登録ください。

Share Button
Read More
Japanese financial services companies in the UK and EMEA after Brexit

Japanese financial services firms in the UK have remained fairly resilient since Brexit, in terms of turnover and headcount – with significant growth shown by the non-life insurers and leasing and financing companies, but less growth for some in the banking and securities sectors.  On the other hand, the UK has had significant outflows of Japanese capital, whereas Ireland, Luxembourg and the Netherlands have had significant inflows.

Headcount

bar chart showing growth in UK employees of Japanese financial services companies in past 3 years after stagnationJudging by annual reports filed for the UK for the year 2023-2024, after several years of negative or little growth, Japanese financial services companies are starting to expand their hiring in the UK.

Adding in a guesstimate for the banks that are branches, there are over 15,000 employees in the Japan-owned UK financial services sector, and this total has grown by at least 10% over 2021/2 to 2023/4. This total represents around two-thirds of the total working for Japanese financial services firms in the region

This may indicate improving business for the Japanese financial services sector across the whole EMEA region, as many of the Japanese financial services firms in the UK act as EMEA regional headquarters. According to the JETRO Survey on Business Conditions for Japanese-Affiliated Companies Overseas (Global Edition) 2024, 92.4% of Japanese banks overseas were predicting a profit – higher than any other sector. The European edition of the survey showed that 60% of non-bank financial services companies were predicting an increased market share in Europe for 2024.

This overall growth conceals some varying fortunes, however. SMBC Bank International PLC has doubled in size since 2015, to 1,739 employees. Recent growth is partly due to the transfer of employees from SMBC Nikko Capital Markets with the merger of its securities business into SMBC.  This merger process is expected to be completed by year ending March 2025. SMBC Nikko will continue as a derivatives business, conducted by employees within SMBC Bank International.

It is possible that the other two megabanks, MUFG and Mizuho have grown similarly, but as they are branches, it is not possible to verify this. Their securities arms – Mizuho International and MUFG Securities – grew by a third and by 18% respectively since 2015.

Other companies which have grown include Mitsubishi HC Capital, Tokio Marine, Aioi Nissay Dowa Insurance and Toyota Financial Services.

Headcount has dropped significantly 2021/2 to 2023/4 at Daiwa Capital Markets as part of their three year cost reduction programme. The 2024 report shows a £14m profit compared to an £18m loss in the previous year.

Nomura is showing a small recovery in employee numbers, but headcount at 1,876 is still nearly 25% down on 2015/6.

SBI Shinsei, formerly SoftBank owned Shinsei Bank, is making a comeback  in London. It acquired British crypto currency company B2C2 in 2020 and its Japanese Chief Executive was approved by the UK’s FCA in 2024. The intention is to build up institutional business in equity, fixed income and digital and fintech investment.

UK financial services exports to Japan

Bar chart UK financial services exports to Japan

UK financial services exports to Japan

Headcount growth may be due to increased demand from Japan for UK financial servies. UK trade statistics show that financial services exports from the UK to Japan of £2.4bn represented 30% of UK services exports to Japan in the year ending Q3 2024, an increase of 2.1% (non-seasonally adjusted) on the previous year. Financial services exports to Japan grew for the first time in 4 years in 2023.

A substantial proportion of these financial services exports may be Japanese corporate purchases of the services of UK based Japanese financial services firms, or the headquarters of those firms forwarding management fees on to their operations in the UK.

Turnover

turnover of Japanese financial services companies in the UK bar chart showing mixed fortunesThe top 14 Japanese financial services firms in terms of turnover (turnover covering everything from gross written premiums to management fees) show that securities based businesses have had a bumpy few years, but non-life insurers and leasing and financing companies have boomed, in part because of acquisitions. Tokio Marine HCC and Endurance Worldwide’s turnovers reflect their Europe-wide business holdings.

Mergers and acquisitions, entrants and exits

As far as we are aware, there were no mergers and acquisitions in the Japanese financial services sector in the UK in 2023-4. There was one closure, of retail forex broker GMO-Z.COM, which had an operation in London since 2012, and at peak employed 17 people.  One newcomer to the UK was Fuyo Lease Europe, which already had established Fuyo Aviation Capital in London. It has formed a joint venture with Sumitomo Forestry to renovate office buildings in the UK.

The new wave of global acquisitions by Japanese life insurers has not brought capital directly to the UK, however Nippon Life’s acquisition of Resolution Life will mean a much larger presence in the UK, as Resolution Life services many closed book British life insurance brands.

Capital flows

Direct investment flows from Japan, into the finance and insurance sectors, based on Japanese Ministry of Finance data,[1] show that the UK has had the largest outflow ($10bn) of Japanese investment of any country in the Europe, Middle East and Africa region from 2017 to 2023. There was a net inflow in 2023, but the balance across 2017 to 2023 is still slightly negative. Japanese FDI into EMEA financial services to 2023(converted from JPY to USD by rate for each year)

Capital has flowed into Ireland, Luxembourg and the Netherlands since 2017 – this may be partly for favourable taxation reasons, as a reaction to the Brexit referendum but also as funds for specific financial services – for example, in Ireland’s case, for aircraft leasing. Germany and Switzerland have also seen positive flows, but France has seen a small net outflow.

Luxembourg hosts the EU headquarters for insurance companies such as Sompo and Endurance as well as various fund management companies.

Japanese banks have made some investments in British companies in 2023-24, for example Mizuho Bank  invested $20 million in U.K. climate change investment and advisory firm operator Pollination Global Holdings. It is aiming to use the Pollination’s know-how to boost domestic and overseas advisory services in environmental areas and information disclosure and also to set up carbon credit projects.

Assets

Japanese banks are still small compared to other banks in Europe, in terms of total assets. The top ten biggest banks in Europe all have assets of over €1trn, whereas the biggest Japanese megabank in Europe is SMBC International, in the UK, with €51bn in assets (down from €53bn the previous year). SMBC EU AG in Germany is the second largest with €23.1bn (a 30% increase on the previous year). MUFG Bank EU has €12bn in assets and Mizuho Bank EU has €5.2bn (a 14.8% increase on the previous year).

Nomura International in the UK has total assets of €216.5bn – around the same as the assets of other Japanese financial firms in Europe combined. Nomura Financial Products GmbH has assets of €18bn, up from €14bn the previous year. They state in their most recent report that they expect assets to remain within the €15 to €20bn range over the next 24 months.

As can be seen from the chart below, total assets held in the UK have declined over the year, and mainly increased in the EU.

  2023/4 2022/3
Nomura International (UK) €216.5bn (-9%) €238.1bn
MUFG Securities EMEA (UK) €74.7bn (-12%) €85.1bn
SMBC International (UK) €48.6bn (-5%) €51.1bn
Mizuho International (UK) €29.5 bn (-9%) €32.5bn
SMBC EU AG (Germany) €23.1bn (+30%) €17.7bn
Nomura Financial Products GmbH (Germany) €18.1bn (+23%) €14.7bn
MUFG Bank (Europe) (Netherlands) €12.1bn (-5%) €12.8bn
Mizuho Bank Europe (Netherlands) €5.2bn (+13%) €4.6bn
MUFG Securities Europe €4.2bn (+5%) €4.0bn
Norinchukin Bank Europe (Netherlands) €3.1bn (+24%) €2.5bn

(GBP£1 to €1.19 US$1 to €0.97)

Daiwa Capital Markets Europe restructured its balance sheet and business model in 2023 is not included here

Localisation

There has been regulatory pressure on Japanese financial services companies in the UK to improve their corporate governance and risk management since the Lehman Shock of 2008. This has resulted in a reduction of executives being sent from Japan and more locally experienced executives being appointed as executive directors. The branches have not been under as much pressure to localise, and their senior executives are therefore largely Japanese headquarter expatriates. Most of the larger Japanese financial services firms in the UK have more than 30 Japanese expatriate employees. Many of these are at the trainee level, however.[2]

UK entities Total board members % non-Japanese
SMBC Bank International 10 70%
Mizuho International 9 60%
MUFG Securities EMEA 9 70%
Daiwa Capital Markets Europe 6 67%
Nomura International 8 75%

 

SMBC Bank International has ten board members, of whom three are Japanese directors from Japan HQ including the CEO (who has been on the board since 2018 and was appointed CEO in 2023). Alan Keir, formerly of HSBC, was chair of the board for eight years, stepping down in September 2024. He has been replaced by Sophie O’Connor. Of the 1,739 employees in London, 161 are Japanese expatriates.

The Managing Executive Officer, Head of EMEA, Deputy Head of EMEA and Head of Japanese Banking Europe at Mizuho Bank London branch are Japanese nationals from Japan headquarters. Mizuho International PLC has nine board members, of whom four are Japanese directors from Japan HQ, including the Deputy President Yoji Imafuku, appointed in 2024. The CEO Suneel Bakshi has been in post since 2019.

MUFG Bank’s Regional CEO for EMEA and the Managing Director are both Japanese nationals from Japan headquarters.  MUFG Securities EMEA PLC has nine board members, three of whom are Japanese directors from Japan HQ. The CEO is Chris Kyle and the Regional Chief Executive Officer is Hidefumi Yamamura, appointed in 2024. 46 of the 291 employees at Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking are Japanese expatriates.

Maria Bentley took over as chair of the board of Daiwa Capital Markets in 2024 and slimmed the board membership to six, with four people leaving in 2023/4, including two Japanese directors from Japan headquarters. There are now two Japanese board members (both from Japan HQ – the President and a female executive director) and four non-Japanese directors, including Megan McDonald, who became CEO in 2022.

Jonathan Lewis, who had been CEO of Nomura International and Nomura Europe Holdings for ten years, has stepped down, and has become Chair for Nomura Financial Products Europe, Instinet Europe and Nomura Reinsurance (Guernsey). He has been replaced by John Tierney, who has been with Nomura for 26 years. There are now eight board members, two of whom are Japanese directors from Japan HQ, including the Vice-Chairman.

European structure

The European Central Bank and local regulators have demanded that critical decision-making and risk management take place within the EU, post Brexit. Japanese firms have responded by placing executives and substantive operations within the EU. As noted in the previous section, this has not led to any significant shrinking of presence in London and the number of employees in Japanese financial firms in the UK still far outnumber those in the European Union.

It would also seem from the disclosures and annual reports that the European Union banking firms now have to make that the past few years have been quite costly in terms of bolstering presence in the EU, and some restructuring and branch closures have taken place across the EMEA region.

All three banks are bringing their European securities operations under the wing of their European banks, to create universal banks.

The London operations of Japanese financial firms have repositioned themselves as the (non-EU) Europe, Middle East and Africa headquarters, making use of London’s financial infrastructure, expertise, and established market networks.

  Total board members % non-Japanese
MUFG Bank (Europe) NV 4 75%
MUFG Securities Europe NV 6 83%
Mizuho Bank Europe 3 33%
Mizuho Securities Europe 3 100%
SMBC Bank EU executive board 6 67%
SMBC Bank EU supervisory board 4 50%
Norinchukin Bank management board 4 25%
Norinchukin Bank supervisory board 4 50%
Nomura Financial Products Europe 6 67%

 

MUFG opened MUFG Bank (Europe) NV in the Netherlands in 2016, before the Brexit referendum. The expansion since then of the functions of the regional headquarters led to increased costs, followed by a three-year plan to increase revenue, reduce costs and maintain strict internal controls and governance, resulting in the closure of branches in Barcelona, Warsaw and Prague.

The Bank’s remaining branches are in Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy and Spain (Madrid).  It employs 800 people in the Amsterdam HQ and 200 in Germany. There are four members of the management board, three of whom are European including the CEO. The Japanese expatriate  director is deputy President. The Chair is also European.

MUFG operates other financial services such as leasing and fund services in Ireland and Luxembourg. MUFG Securities Europe NV, a subsidiary of MUFG Securities EMEA was established in 2018, also in Amsterdam, and has 58 employees. It has a two tier board of six people, one of whom is a Japanese expatriate, who is the CEO, appointed in 2022.

From July 2025, MUFG Securities’ global subsidiaries will be managed by MUFG Bank instead of MUFG Securities Holdings.

Mizuho Bank Europe was established in the Netherlands in 1974. It has branches in Brussels, Vienna and Madrid, employing 121 people in total. There are three members on the management board, two of whom are Japanese expatriates – the CEO and the Chief Business Officer. The other operations in Europe are branches of Mizuho Bank Japan – Frankfurt, Duesseldorf, Milan and Paris.

Mizuho Securities Europe was established in 2020 in Frankfurt, with branches in Madrid and Paris, and employs 43 people. All three members of the board are German. Work is underway to merge the EU securities business into Mizuho Bank Europe to create a universal bank, focused on Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Paris and Madrid. This will, subject to regulatory approval, mean the closure of Mizuho’s Brussels, Düsseldorf, Milan and Vienna operations.

In the UK, Mizuho Corporate Services EMEA was formed in 2023 to provide corporate function services to the region. It started operations on April 1 2024 and 900 employees were transferred to it from Mizuho International PLC and Mizuho Bank London branch.

SMBC Bank EU opened in Frankfurt in 2019 and now has 328 employees. It has branches in Amsterdam, Prague, Madrid, Dublin, Milan, Paris and Düsseldorf employing a further 104 people. SMBC Nikko Bank Luxembourg has now been brought under SMBC Bank EU’s umbrella, as part of the move to a universal bank. There are 6 members of the executive board of SMBC Bank EU, two of whom are Japanese expatriates, including the chair. The CEO is Stanislas Roger. There are four members of the supervisory board, two of whom are Japanese expatriates.

The Norinchukin Bank opened a subsidiary in the Netherlands in 2018 and now employs around 68 people. The supervisory board has four members, two of whom are Japanese expatriates, one of whom is the Chair of the board. There are also four members of the management board, three of whom are Japanese expatriates, including the Chair.

Nomura set up Nomura Financial Products Europe GmbH in 2017, which has branches in Italy, Spain, France, Sweden, Netherlands, Switzerland and Finland. It has six members on the management board, 2 of whom are Japanese expatriates – one of whom is the CEO, appointed in 2024. Other Nomura subsidiaries include Nomura Funds Ireland PLC.

Daiwa Capital Markets has operations in Frankfurt (Daiwa Capital Markets Deutschland GmbH established in 2017, CEO Fujino Yusuke, appointed 2023) and a representative office in Paris.

Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance has announced in June 2024 that it will merge its MS Amlin organisation (primarily based in the UK) with MSIG Insurance Europe, headquartered in Cologne, Germany. The group management services company, MSIG Corporate Services (Europe), is based in the UK.  MS Amlin Insurance SE is currently headquartered in Belgium with branches in Amstelveen, Paris and London.

Klaus M. Przybyla will be the CEO of the new company. MSIG Insurance Europe currently has four management board members, one of whom is Japanese.

MSI rebranded MS Amlin AG in Switzerland as MS Reinsurance.

Tokio Marine Europe SA is based in Luxembourg, and is a subsidiary of HCC International Insurance Company Plc in the UK. It has over 350 staff in offices across Europe.

CIS, Middle East and Africa

The search for growth has taken Japanese companies and financial services firms to higher risk markets in the CIS and EMEA, but as yet, their presence is small and there have been some closures of branches.

Thanks to Saudi Arabia’s new Regional Headquarters programme, providing all kinds of carrots and sticks for foreign multinationals to set up their Middle East regional headquarters there, we may see more Japanese activity there.

Mizuho is the only Japanese bank so far to respond to the programme, setting up a separate Middle East and Africa regional headquarters in Riyadh, in November 2024. According to Mizuho it expects further need for financing, including investment in infrastructure in the region, to move towards a net zero society and reduce oil dependence.

It has also partnered with Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund to create a Tokyo-listed exchange-traded fund featuring Saudi shares.

SMFG has also recently signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the National Infrastructure Fund of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to support infrastructure development projects in Saudi Arabia.

All of the Japanese financial services firms continue to have operations in Russia.

Back office and corporate services

Mizuho set up Mizuho Global Services India in 2020 and intends to triple its tech and administrative staff in India to around 1,000 workers by the end of fiscal 2027, turning the country into its main hub for these operations. Nomura has had a regional services office in India for the past twenty years.

The UK continues to have strength in providing corporate services such as learning & development, marketing, logistics, law and finance and accounting, reflected in the recent establishment of Mizuho Corporate Services EMEA in the UK.

Human Resources

Nearly half of new hires in Japan at the Japanese megabanks in 2024/5 will be midcareer workers, as lenders seek specialized talent, rather than hiring new graduates who are then trained as generalists as before. Japanese banks in Europe are also hiring from the growing pool of local Japanese people, who have permanent residency in the UK.

London will continue to have a role in training up a new generation of specialists. SMFG is recruiting graduates in Japan for a fast track to work overseas in New York or London from as early as their second year. Mizuho and MUFG have similar schemes.

As part of their drive to counter the labour shortages in Japan and recruit specialists, Japan’s banks have continued to build up and celebrate their alumni networks.

2024’s headaches

  • MUFG Bank Japan employees stealing customer assets from safe deposit boxes
  • Nomura was fined for manipulating Japanese government bond futures market
  • A former Nomura employee was charged robbery, attempted murder and arson of a customer
  • Sompo Insurance CEO stepped down to take responsibility for the company’s involvement in used car dealer Bigmotor Co.’s insurance fraud scandal
  • Japan’s FSA penalized MUFG units for unauthorized sharing of client data
  • Cyberattacks (DDoS) hit both MUFG and Mizuho in Japan

Conclusions

  • Past history and recent trends in Japanese financial services companies in the UK reflect the continuity of London’s attraction as a global financial centre in terms of a large and specialist labour pool and infrastructure.
  • Despite Brexit, the number of people working for Japanese financial services companies in the UK has remained steady, with some recent growth.
  • Turnover in the UK continues to grow – in part driven by global acquisitions rather than acquisitions of British companies, as happened in the past.
  • The great majority of employees in Japanese financial services companies across Europe, Middle East and Africa are in the UK. The UK is often host to management and corporate function services for the whole region, although often administrative and IT functions are further outsourced to India.
  • In order to comply with EU regulatory pressures, Japanese financial services have all set up subsidiaries within the European Union, and placed both locally experienced and Japanese expatriate executives on the boards of these subsidiaries. Often these subsidiaries still report into a UK holding company, and the more senior regional executives are still based in the UK.
  • The picture is not so positive for the UK for the securities businesses however, or capital flows. There is a discernible shift of capital to Amsterdam for banking and securities and also to Luxembourg for fund management and Ireland for aircraft leasing.
  • Japanese financial services firms are also looking to invest or support their clients’ investment in infrastructure, green energy and zero carbon projects, in the UK, EU and Middle East
  • Turnover in securities and investment banking firms has not shown consistent growth and there has been some restructuring, consolidating and closing of smaller operations in the region.
  • When Japanese financial services companies have globalised through acquiring a major multinational (such as Tokyo Marine acquiring HCC, Sompo acquiring Endurance, Nomura acquiring Lehman Brothers), then they continue to have global clients and behave accordingly in terms of governance and where they deploy resources.
  • Japanese financial services companies, mainly banking and non-life insurance, that are still servicing a large number of Japanese corporate clients may also be looking to the European Union more, if those Japanese corporate clients have their main financial and legal bases there – as companies such as Panasonic and Sony now do. We expect further capital to flow to the EU accordingly. Another indicator of this shift is the 50% increase in the number of Japanese nationals in the Netherlands over the past ten years, although at around 10,000, this is still one-sixth of the number of Japanese people the UK hosts.

[1] Note, however, that data is often not disclosed in full in Japanese Ministry of Finance FDI reports, for confidentiality reasons.

[2] According to the Japanese Chamber of Commerce and Industry in the UK 2024 directory

This is an excerpt from our 2025 report on Japanese Financial Services in the UK and EMEA, with a directory of 300 Japanese financial services companies in the region  – which can be purchased and downloaded online here

For more content like this, subscribe to the free Rudlin Consulting Newsletter. 最新の在欧日系企業の状況については無料の月刊Rudlin Consulting ニューズレターにご登録ください。

Share Button
Read More
Clear trends from less data on Japanese companies in Europe

The latest data on the numbers of Japanese companies around the world from the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs was published over the summer. It’s back down to one spreadsheet, in normal sized font, where the only colours used are to highlight the title of each region. The number of spreadsheets published had mushroomed from 1 to 5 between 2013 and 2018, and even with (or maybe because of) the copious use of tabs, freeze frames and various shades of yellow, orange, green and purple, the whole thing was extremely difficult to navigate.

I used to imagine the moans of the junior civil servants putting in long hours to compile this, the sighs of the middle management having to check its accuracy, and then the teeth grinding of the general managers who wished for the older, simpler days of a printed out hard copy. In the new stripped down MoFA world, the only data disclosed is the total number of Japanese organisations in each country. There are no longer any categories regarding whether they are public limited companies, joint ventures or branches. The data on Japanese nationals resident overseas used to be combined with the data on organisations, but is now published separately.

In a way less data* is less transparency, but perhaps usability is more important than the sheer volume. This seems to have been the decision that Hitachi has made too. The number of pages of its most recent integrated report has been halved from 106 to 53. In Hitachi’s case this can be excused by the sheer size and complexity of the organisation – 320,000 employees working in a huge variety of businesses. What led to the cull was that those writing the report – the investor relations department – were also the users, who talked through the report with investors. They themselves felt it was hard to explain, and feedback from the investors also pointed to usability concerns. Hitachi has won awards for its reports, so this was a bold decision to make.

According to a survey of  881 companies by KPMG, the average integrated report in Japan had 75 pages and 66% of all surveyed companies had 61 pages or more. This ratio has increased by 4 percentage points from two years ago, thanks to the increasing obligation felt to report on ESG metrics.

Anyway, the new simplicity means there is only one chart we can produce from the MoFA data, for countries with more than 100 Japanese companies in Europe, as below:

And yes, it does make certain trends very clear.

  • Germany still dominates as a host of Japanese companies, but there seems to be a tailing off of growth (+22% since 2013)
  • Conversely, the numbers of Japanese companies in the UK has fallen (-10% since 2013), but now stabilised.
  • France continues to grow as a host of Japanese companies (+21% since 2013), with quite a jump in the last year. This may be as a result of the 10 or so acquisitions made of French companies by Japanese companies 2020-2022
  • There was a significant leap in the numbers of Japanese companies hosted by Netherlands and Italy in 2019. It’s difficult to know whether this due to the “hard” nature of Brexit becoming clearer in 2018-9 or some change in the way MoFA was categorising its data.
  • Eastern European countries, probably due to automotive and other manufacturing costs and existing skills, have become popular – Poland, Hungary, Romania, Czechia
  • Smaller, more service sector oriented countries in the Nordics and Baltics are also becoming more popular such as Estonia, Denmark, Sweden
  • The above has meant that Switzerland, Belgium, Finland and Austria have dropped down the rankings

*Grammar pedants may recoil from the use of “less” with “data” here. Sorry.  This may reassure.

For more content like this, subscribe to the free Rudlin Consulting Newsletter. 最新の在欧日系企業の状況については無料の月刊Rudlin Consulting ニューズレターにご登録ください。

Share Button
Read More
Japanese financial services companies in the UK

These two pieces of research from Dr Sarah Hall (a professor of economic geography at the University of Nottingham and Fellow of UK in a Changing Europe) and Martin Heneghan confirm what we have seen in our own researches on Japanese financial services companies in the UK. There has not been as drastic a decline in numbers employed by Japanese companies in the sector as expected since Brexit, instead, it has been more of a slight increase, followed by flatlining.

We estimate the numbers employed in the UK by Japanese financial services companies was around 13,400 in 2015/6, rising by around 1,000 to 2019/20, dropping slightly in 2020/21 and then returning to 2019/20 levels the year after. It is hard to be precise about the absolute numbers and trend, as two of the three Japanese megabanks, who employ around 1,000 people each, are branches of their Japan headquarters, so do not issue annual reports in which employee numbers are reported. These two megabanks, Mizuho and MUFG, may come under pressure from the Bank of England to have subsidiaries in the UK too, according to recent rumours.

We estimate there are around 160,000 people employed by Japanese companies in all sectors, so the financial services sector represents less than 10% of this. As of June 2022, 1.06 million people were employed in the UK in the financial services sector in the UK, so Japanese owned companies only represent 1.3% of the total employed in the sector.

The other issue raised by the two pieces of research are whether other EU cities have benefited from any additional growth, which the UK has missed out on. As can be seen from the chart, Toyo Keizai data shows that there was an overall upward trend in the number of Japanese financial services companies in the European region, of around 12% from 2015/6 to 2022/23.  The UK still dominates as a host, and the numbers of companies hosted rose 7% – so below trend. Germany doubled the number of Japanese financial services companies it hosted over the period. The numbers rose sharply in the Netherlands and then dropped. Just as Dr Hall’s research suggests, Ireland, Luxembourg and France seem to have benefited, albeit from a much smaller base.

Toyo Keizai breaks down the sector into banks, trust banking, securities, investment trusts and advisory, commodities, lending and credit, leasing and investment businesses, as well as life and non life insurance and “other” finance. “Other” finance is the sector which showed the most growth for the UK – perhaps fintech and less traditional financial services are included in this. For Ireland the leasing sector, particularly aircraft leasing, is a growth area.  Germany now hosts four Japanese securities companies, from none in 2015/6. The growth and then decline for the Netherlands seems to have been mostly in investment businesses. Luxembourg has gained one or two companies across all sectors.

Given that the rather nebulous “investment businesses” and “other finance” are the two biggest sectors, showing the most growth along with leasing, we agree with Dr Hall’s conclusion that “given the complex interplay of these two factors, we suggest that far from being done, Brexit is being played out within a sector that is itself in a period of profound flux and hence it is likely to be some time before the full impacts of Brexit of UK financial services, and their consequences for wider economic growth, are fully understood.”

Our list of the 94 Japanese financial services companies in the UK, giving their full name, city or town of location, number employed, description of financial services offered and ultimate parent company is available for £10+VAT. Please email us for an invoice.

For more content like this, subscribe to the free Rudlin Consulting Newsletter. 最新の在欧日系企業の状況については無料の月刊Rudlin Consulting ニューズレターにご登録ください。

Share Button
Read More
Japanese companies in the UK 7 years on – the new third phase

Executive summary

In the seven years since the Brexit referendum, the benefits of Japanese long term planning for resilience have become clear. Although employment by Japanese companies in the UK has fallen since 2018/9, this is largely in the automotive sector, triggered by the closure of the Honda Swindon plant. Non-automotive manufacturing employment and investment have stayed steady, but there have been no new manufacturing companies coming to the UK.

Employment in the wholesale sector has also fallen, as Japanese companies move their European logistics, warehousing and coordination functions to the EU. There has been significant disinvestment from the UK financial sector, but again employment seems to have held steady.

Germany has almost caught up with the UK as the largest host of Japanese companies in the EU and has overtaken the UK as the largest host of Japanese corporate expatriates.

Now the smoke and fog of Britain’s departure from the EU, and the pandemic have cleared, a new third phase of Japanese investment is taking shape. It is more focused on geopolitical concerns around climate change, energy, defence and security. The UK is seen as an important partner in this, but needs to ensure that it strengthens its long term policy commitments to these sectors, which require large investments and the support of host communities, as well as collaboration and synchronization with the EU, Africa and the Middle East.

Contents

Employment by Japanese companies in the UK grew to 2018/9, then shrank since

Germany has nearly caught up with the UK as a host of Japanese companies

More company closures in the UK than in Germany

A similar number of new Japanese companies opened in the UK and Germany since

UK still the target of Japanese M&A, but on a smaller scale than before

Switzerland overtakes the UK as largest net recipient of Japanese investment in Europe

Manufacturing employment holding steady, apart from the automotive sector 

Net disinvestment in UK financial services sector, although employment remains steady

Germany has overtaken the UK become the largest host to Japanese corporate expatriates in Europe

What does it all mean? An acceleration of trends, new and old

 

Employment by Japanese companies in the UK grew to 2018/9, then shrank since

There were 98,000 people employed by Japan owned companies in the UK, according to the Toyo Keizai[1] database published April 2023, compared to 106,000 in 2015/6.

The Rudlin Consulting database, which includes more companies who have a Japanese owner through acquisition, shows around 160,000 employees for 2021/2, up slightly from 156,000 in 2015/6.

Both sets of data show that employee numbers reached a peak in 2018/9 and have fallen since. This is a different pattern to what has happened in France and Germany, where the employee numbers peaked in 2020/1, but have fallen since. The Netherlands shows somewhat bumpy growth.

Looking at the employment data by sector, it seems the shrinkage in employment in the UK is almost entirely due to the decline in the automotive sector, where around 11,000 jobs have been lost in manufacturing and wholesale.

 

Germany has nearly caught up with the UK as a host of Japanese companies

Toyo Keizai estimates there were 875 Japanese incorporated subsidiaries in the UK in 2015/6 compared to 764 in Germany. By 2022/3 there were 982 Japanese incorporated subsidiaries in the UK, compared to 975 in Germany.

Rudlin Consulting estimates also include branches and more subsidiaries acquired through acquisition than Toyo Keizai. As of June 2023, we estimate there are 1,113 Japan owned organisations in Germany, compared to 1,151 in the UK.

 

More company closures in the UK than in Germany

48 companies closed in Germany since 2018 and 145 closed in the UK since 2017. The biggest sectoral net loss was in wholesale in the UK. A likely explanation is that many companies were dissolved or turned into branches, once they lost their European wholesale coordination functions, with warehousing and logistics focused more on the EU single market.

  • 26 of the UK closures were in the automotive sector
  • 41 were services
  • 39 were wholesale
  • 27 were manufacturing companies
  • 11 were in the IT sector
  • 9 financial
  • 8 logistics
  • 6 chemicals
  • 4 retail
  • 4 food

(some companies in multiple categories).

Many of these closures were due to consolidation and mergers, rather than outright withdrawal from the UK.

A similar number of new Japanese companies opened in the UK and Germany since 2017

64 new companies were established in Germany since 2017, compared to 63 new companies in the UK (of which 4 divested or closed since):

Of the 63 new companies in the UK:

  • 35 were in the services sector
  • 14 in wholesale sector
  • 6 in IT
  • 6 in the financial services sector
  • 3 in manufacturing
  • 3 in energy – storage, renewables, production
  • 1 in logistics (following merger of container businesses of several Japanese companies)
  • 1 in automotive (Highly Marelli, formed from merger with Calsonic Kansei)

(some companies in multiple categories)

UK still the target of Japanese M&A, but on a smaller scale than before

We have tracked 179 companies coming under Japanese ownership in the UK from 2017 to 2023 to date compared to 79 in Germany. These are not exhaustive numbers, and may well reflect a UK bias.

Furthermore, many of the acquisitions were not made directly of British or German companies, but rather of US or other European headquartered companies, which have subsidiaries in the UK or Germany. There may also be recent acquisitions which have not been identified yet.

With those caveats in mind, it does seem to be that majority (123 of the 179 UK acquisitions) were made over the three years from 2017-2019, and since then the rate has been more around 25 companies a year or fewer. There seems to be a similar trend in Germany.

The biggest acquisitions across Europe since 2017 have been:

  • Takeda’s acquisition of Irish pharmaceutical company (London listed) Shire for $64bn in 2019
  • Hitachi’s acquisition of Swiss company ABB’s Power Grids business for $11bn in 2020/2
  • Renesas acquisition of US founded, UK domiciled semiconductor company Dialog in 2021 for $5.9bn
  • Mitsubishi Corporation’s acquisition of Dutch energy company Eneco for $4.4bn
  • Taisho’s acquisition of French pharmaceutical manufacturer UPSA SAS for $1.6n from Bristol-Myers Squibb.
  • Hitachi Rail’s acquisition of Italy’s Ansaldo STS (1.5bn euros) from 2015 to 2019
  • Nidec’s $1.2bn 2017 acquisition of Emerson Electric’s motors, drives and power generation businesses, which included the Welsh drives make Control Techniques and the French motor manufacturer, Leroy-Somer.
  • Toyota Industries’ acquisition of Dutch logistics company Vanderlande for $1.3bn in 2017
  • NEC’s acquisition of Danish IT company KMD in 2018/9 for $1.2bn
  • Fujifilm acquisition of US company Biogen’s Hillerod manufacturing in Denmark for $930m in 2019

In the past, British companies have often been the target of the largest M&A deals, such as SoftBank acquiring ARM, NSG acquiring Pilkington Glass and various acquisitions in the financial services sector. This preference does not seem to have continued, apart from the Renesas/Dialog deal, although there have been smaller scale acquisitions in sectors such as recruitment and staffing, drives, tyres, food and paper wholesale in the UK.

Switzerland overtakes the UK as largest net recipient of Japanese investment in Europe

These big deals have of course had an impact on the flow of investment from Japan into Europe, causing lumpiness in year-to-year totals.

Switzerland received more cumulative net direct investment from Japan since 2017 than the UK, which was the largest recipient of Japanese investment in Europe in the past. The large inflow into Switzerland in 2019 in the wholesale and retail sector was presumably related to Hitachi’s acquisition of the ABB power grids business. The Netherlands was the third largest recipient and Ireland the fourth largest recipient.

The net divestment from the UK in 2020 was in the communications sector and may have been related to SoftBank, as much of their investment activities is located in London. There was also net divestment from the services sector in 2018. There were no major divestments by Japanese companies in terms of selling off subsidiaries in that year, so this might represent movement of assets from UK based subsidiaries to EU based subsidiaries as part of companies such as Sony shifting ownership their intellectual property rights.

In manufacturing, investment in UK electrical machinery, food and chemicals has been greater than the investment in transportation equipment (automotive) and substantially more than in German electrical machinery, food and chemicals manufacturing over the same period.

Cumulative Japanese direct investment totals for Germany and the UK in since 2017 are: [2]

Sector Germany UK
Food manufacturing $0.8bn $9.8bn
Chemicals & pharmaceuticals manufacturing $3.1bn $7.1bn
Electrical machinery manufacturing $0.6bn $7.8bn
Transportation equipment manufacturing $9.3bn $0.8bn
Communications $0.6bn $45.3bn
Wholesale and retail $2bn $3.2bn
Finance and insurance $8.2bn -$2.3bn
Services $1.2bn -$34.5bn

As can be seen below, Ireland has had both inflows and outflows in the chemicals and pharmaceuticals manufacturing sector in 2019 and 2020, presumably related to the Takeda/Shire deal. Denmark had an outflow in 2019, which may have been related to the sale by Takeda of two factories in Denmark to Orifarm.

The data from Japan’s Ministry of Finance needs to be treated with caution, as in many cases (France and financial services sector for example) no data is given, for confidentiality reasons.

Manufacturing employment holding steady, apart from the automotive sector

Disinvestment from the UK in the automotive sector in 2019 and 2021 was presumably related to the closure of Honda’s Swindon plant which was announced in February 2019 and finally shut down in July 2021. 20 or so Japanese automotive suppliers also ceased operations in the UK during this period.

Germany has benefited the most from Japanese investment in the automotive sector – the large inflow in 2019 may be related to Sekisui’s acquisition of Proseat’s European operations – with manufacturing in Germany, Poland and Czech Republic. The UK plant was closed in 2021.

There may have been some second hand investment in the UK automotive sector which is not reflected in the data. Belgium’s status as the second largest recipient of investment is almost certainly due to Toyota having their European headquarters there. Some of that investment may well then have made its way to Toyota’s plants in the UK.

The larger inflow of automotive investment into the UK in 2018 may have been related to Nissan starting production of the Juke at Sunderland in 2019 and then the third generation Qashqai.

Non-automotive manufacturing employment grew to 2019/20 and has held steady since.  Most of the Japanese manufacturers we looked at set up Brexit committees, planned and invested for various scenarios. They must have come to the conclusion that the cost/benefit analyses showed it made more sense to stay put and invest in mitigation measures than to shut down and transfer manufacturing elsewhere.

Net disinvestment in UK financial services sector, although employment remains steady

Although the cumulative investment by Japan into in the UK financial sector was negative from 2017 to 2022, according to Rudlin Consulting data, employment in this sector has held relatively steady. It is hard to be certain of this, as two of the three main Japanese banks are branches of the European headquarters in the Netherlands or the Japanese headquarters, so employee numbers are not disclosed.

Ireland has been a focus for Japanese aircraft leasing and related financing, which may explain why it has benefited most from Japanese financial services sector investment since 2017. For example, in 2020-2022, Japan Investment Adviser subsidiary JP Leasing Services set up a leasing company in Ireland with Airbus, acquiring several aircraft, which may  account for the large investment in 2020.

Germany has overtaken the UK become the largest host to Japanese corporate expatriates in Europe

The general trend in Japanese corporate expatriation across EMEA is downward, and does not seem to have picked up after the pandemic, apart from in the Netherlands and the UAE. The shift of Japanese expatriates (largely based around London) is likely to be an indicator of regional headquarter functions shifting to Germany and the Netherlands, particularly in financial services and trading companies, where the density of Japanese expatriate staff is the highest.

What does it all mean? An acceleration of trends, new and old

I have, over the past seven years, tried to approach the data I gather on Japanese companies in the UK with an open mind. Nonetheless, I admit to having a Big Theory of Brexit (beyond believing it to be an unnecessary waste of time, effort and resources) which is that it accelerates trends which were already there.

So the question I wanted to answer, in looking at the data this time, was what trends were showing through, new and old.

In my history of Mitsubishi Corporation in London, examining how its business developed from 1915,[3] it became apparent that the organization had quite quickly moved from an importer/exporter trading model to a regional coordinator. It was following a well-known model of globalization in business to move from pure export to manufacturing locally and then to some kind of transnational model, with regional centers of excellence.

Japanese trading companies like Mitsubishi Corporation do not directly manufacture, but often invest in manufacturing, as Mitsubishi Corporation did, in acquiring Princes Foods in the UK in 1989. Primarily though, they are in London because they see it as an important global and regional hub, a good training ground for their rising stars to gather information and influence global policy making.

Just after Brexit became a reality, I remember attending a large gathering of senior executives of Japanese companies in the UK. The then head of Mitsubishi Corporation in Europe, Middle East and Africa spoke, making it clear that while he thought Brexit was a negative for Japanese business, the company would not be leaving the UK.

Having worked at Mitsubishi Corporation myself, including in planning and coordination, I instinctively understood this to be about the strategic value that a presence in the UK had for Mitsubishi Corporation, and other zaikai[4] Japanese companies.  Nonetheless I worried that the UK’s strategic value to Japanese companies would diminish by no longer having as much influence in the EU once it was on the outside.

The only Japanese trading company to have left the UK since 2017 is Sojitz, which is not one of the top five of Mitsubishi Corporation, Mitsui, Sumitomo Corporation, Itochu and Marubeni. It has clearly decided to focus on chemicals trading, and to put that headquarters in Germany, which has traditionally been seen by Japanese companies as the regional leader in chemicals manufacturing.

Other regional headquarters to have left the UK were part of the earliest phase of globalization – the wholesalers who were importing from Japan. They have moved their regional coordination, warehousing and logistics hubs to the EU – which is why there has been significant growth in employee numbers and expatriate Japanese numbers in the Netherlands. At the same time, the overall drop in the number of Japanese expatriates across the region may well be due to how localized many of the wholesale operations have become in terms of senior management.

The second phase companies – those who opened manufacturing operations in the UK – have also shifted further out of the UK, and taken their supply chains with them. Consumer electronics manufacturing left some time ago, and the main concern had been for the automotive sector. As the analysis above shows, Germany has had by far the greater share of automotive investment in Europe since 2017, although this may be a one off, due to an acquisition. Some of the investment into Belgium may feed through to the UK via Toyota, however, and both Toyota and Nissan have not shown any signs of leaving the UK yet.

The third phase, of having regional coordination and centres of excellence, is showing through more strongly now for the UK. Now that the regional coordination which was more to do with supply chains for manufacturers, or logistics and warehousing for importing from Japan has shifted away from the UK, the UK is left with the geopolitically minded, strategic investors, in energy, transportation and telecommunications infrastructure, defence and R&D in biotech and pharmaceuticals and semiconductors.

These investors are not so influenced by the search for growth overseas which characterized Japanese acquisitions in the UK and elsewhere during the lost three decades of the 1990s to the 2010s. They are driven by geopolitical concerns regarding climate change and reducing dependence on hostile states in sectors such as telecommunications, energy and digital data.

Despite the current British government’s taboo on mentioning industrial policy, it is clear that many British politicians are aware of this new phase and realise that the UK’s concerns align with Japan’s. There has been an embarrassment of former and current prime ministers and ministers at recent UK-Japan events in London. The exhibition stands at the one I attended, as a non-executive director of a Japanese soft-power initiative, Japan House London, were almost exclusively focused on renewable energy.

The recent announcement[5] by the Japanese government that they will harmonise Japanese standards for domestically produced defence equipment with US and European standards, to reduce maintenance costs and increase business opportunities for Japanese defence companies is very much in line with this new third phase. The UK, Italy and Japan have merged their fighter jet programmes and are aiming to develop a next generation fighter jet demonstrator by 2027.

It is not going to be entirely smooth – Japanese trading companies have shown no inclination to disinvest from Russian LNG projects, for example. This will have been the subject of discussions with the Japanese government in terms of impact on Japanese dependency on foreign energy supplies – the Sakhalin 2 project, for example, supplies around 9%  of Japan’s LNG imports.[6]

In terms of “making Brexit work” – for phase 1 and 2 companies, this ship has sailed as far as traditional import export, manufacturing related trade is concerned. They made all the contingency plans and moved what needed to moved a long time ago. There have been no new Japanese manufacturers setting up in Britain, and it is unlikely this will happen until the UK joins the single market again.

For phase 3, making Brexit work will be more to do with ensuring that cooperation and synchronisation with the rest of Europe and the UK’s positive influence inside and outside Europe is as strong as possible in the strategic areas of energy, defence, telecommunications and transportation infrastructure and R&D. This will not have the positive populist impact of phase 2 manufacturing projects, which bring thousands of jobs and supply chains in their wake. In fact the impact electorally could be negative, as we have seen with nuclear power, wind farms and high speed rail – there is antagonism towards the disruption to the countryside they cause and the massive investments they require. This is a problem familiar to Japanese companies in their home country too.

Furthermore, this collaboration is not just about Europe, it needs to bring in the neighbouring continents of Africa and the Middle East. Obviously climate change has to be tackled globally, it cannot be “environmentalism in one country”. Successive Japanese governments have worried about Japan’s energy poverty for decades and this has driven much of the investment, particularly by Japanese trading companies, in overseas energy projects. Trading companies have invested in Africa and the Middle East, often through their regional headquarters in the UK, in renewable energy projects ranging from hydroelectric power generation to solar home systems.

Japanese companies like working with other Japanese companies, so once a beachhead of investment is established, others in the supply chain and support system will follow – as the UK saw with Japanese car companies in the 1970s and the 1980s. That ecosystem is still strong in the UK and many of the components suppliers can also supply the energy and infrastructure sectors.

This new third phase of Japanese investment in and via the UK is not going to be attracted by the UK government giving grants to build or re-equip factories, but by it showing a willingness to invest for results which will only be seen in the long term, and to put political energy into building sustainable government policies and community support.

A pdf of this report can be downloaded here

Our latest 2023 directories of Japanese companies in the UK are available here.

[1] https://biz.toyokeizai.net/en/data/service/detail/id=860&academic=1

[2] https://www.mof.go.jp/english/policy/international_policy/reference/balance_of_payments/ebpfdii.htm

[3] The History of Mitsubishi Corporation in London: 1915 to Present Day Routledge Advances in Asia-Pacific Business, 2000 https://www.amazon.co.uk/History-Mitsubishi-Corporation-London-Asia-Pacific/dp/0415228727

[4] Zaikai means the Japanese business and finance community, particularly those companies with power and influence and connections to the political sphere, which are seen as representing Japan in the world.

[5] https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Aerospace-Defense-Industries/Japan-to-standardize-arms-with-U.S.-Europe-for-joint-maintenance accessed 22 June 2023

[6] https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/japans-mitsui-says-no-plans-exit-russias-sakhalin-2-lng-project-2023-06-21/

For more content like this, subscribe to the free Rudlin Consulting Newsletter. 最新の在欧日系企業の状況については無料の月刊Rudlin Consulting ニューズレターにご登録ください。

Share Button
Read More
UK employment by Japanese automotive companies has fallen 25% over 4 years

The statement by Stellantis that it may be forced to shut some of its UK operations if the current local content rules in the Brexit deal continue prompted me to take a look at the current situation for Japanese car companies in the UK.

As The Economist pointed out recently, Japanese car companies are behind in the race to produce electric vehicles – partly due to being victims of their own successes with hybrid vehicles. But there are signs of change with the new president of Toyota‘s announcement of new EV models and Honda‘s electric vehicle joint venture with Sony. Nissan has been focused on electric vehicles from the start but somewhat distracted with wrangles with Renault post-Ghosn.

Despite being laggards, Japanese car companies are still very important to the UK economy. Nissan is the largest UK manufacturer of cars and Toyota the third largest. Announcements are expected by Toyota and Nissan soon on what they are going to do with replacement models for their Corolla and Juke respectively, both currently manufactured in the UK, but I have not seen any leaks yet in the Japanese media on what the plans might be for this. As the spokespeople quoted in The Economist say, it would be helpful to longer term planning if the UK could be seen as a stable partner, and had an industrial policy – or at least acknowledge that not having an industrial policy is in its own way an industrial policy.

The danger is that Japanese car companies and their suppliers just dwindle away in the UK

Without longer term plans in place, the danger is that Japanese car companies and their suppliers just dwindle away in the UK. The latest data I have compiled shows that employment in the UK by Japanese automotive companies has fallen 25% from 2017/8 to 2021/2 from 43,000 to 32,000. These figures exclude what could be a further 7,500 employees, working for companies which have not yet submitted their UK annual reports for FY2021/2 – Itochu’s subsidiaries Kwik-Fit, Stapleton’s Tyre Services and European Tyre Enterprises, GS Yuasa battery sales and manufacturing, Hitachi Astemo and Highly Marelli.

Around 4,000 of the jobs lost were from Honda‘s Swindon closure. The remaining 7,000 missing jobs can partly be explained by the closure of other automotive companies:

  1. Akebono (closed 2021)
  2. Alps Alpine (2021)
  3. Calsonic Kansei Sunderland (2020)
  4. CCI Corporation (2020)
  5. Futaba Industrial UK (2019)
  6. Hi-Lex Cable System (2021)
  7. Honda Trading Europe (2022)
  8. Johnan UK (2021)
  9. Kansai Paint Europe (2020)
  10. Keihin Europe (2021)
  11. MC Ionic Solutions (2021)
  12. Mitsuba Europe (2023)
  13. Nichias Europe (2020)
  14. Nichirin UK (2022)
  15. Proseat (2021)
  16. Senju Manufacturing Europe (2019)
  17. Showa UK (2022)
  18. The Colt Car Co (2022)
  19. TMD Friction (2023)
  20. Toyo Denso UK (2023)
  21. Toyoda Gosei (2023)
  22. TS Tech UK (2021)
  23. TT Assembly Systems UK (2021)
  24. UYS (2022)
  25. Yokowo Europe (2023)

Not all of these were complete closures – some were as the result of a consolidation of subsidiaries.

Toyota Motor Manufacturing UK’s employment levels have stayed relatively stable over the past 4 years at around 2,700. Nissan Motor Manufacturing of the UK’s total employment numbers have dropped by 20% or 1,600 however, from 7,933 in 2017/8 to 6,335 in 2022/3.

If we just focus on Japanese companies with production in the UK, there was a 26% decline in employment over 2018-2022 – unsurprisingly close to the overall trend – as around 74% of all Japanese automotive employees in the UK are employed in manufacturing operations.

Unpicking what is happening overall with Japanese automotive companies in Europe is for another day. What has been on our radar recently is how many Japanese automotive companies such as Toyota group (which includes Suzuki and Isuzu), Nissan and Honda are showing more interest in manufacturing combustion engine models in Africa, particularly Ghana, for CKD, lightweight models and SUVs.

For more content like this, subscribe to the free Rudlin Consulting Newsletter. 最新の在欧日系企業の状況については無料の月刊Rudlin Consulting ニューズレターにご登録ください。

Share Button
Read More
Is the UK losing out to the Netherlands as the core of Europe in pharmaceuticals?

The new commissioner of the Netherlands Foreign Investment Agency, Hilde van der Meer, was interviewed in the Nikkei newspaper during her visit to Japan in March 2023.  The headline was “becoming the core of Europe with pharmaceuticals” and she outlines in the interview how multinational pharmaceutical companies have opened offices in the Netherlands since the European Medicines Agency moved to Amsterdam after Brexit.

We took a look at our database and can see that one Japanese pharmaceuticals company, JCR, has recently opened an office in the Netherlands. The other, larger, Japanese pharmaceuticals companies were already in the Netherlands long before the EMA move – such as Astellas, Takeda, Eisai, and Daiichi Sankyo. Chugai does not have operations there – its European HQ is still in the UK – but its parent company, Swiss pharmaceuticals company Roche, does have a subsidiary there. Otsuka opened a company in the Netherlands in 2018, which acts as a Marketing Authorization Holder for the EU and in the same year closed its Otsuka Europe Development and Commercialization operation in the UK. Shionogi also opened a subsidiary in the Netherlands in 2018, and the UK subsidiary became a branch of it at the same time, so this  may also have been a result of the EMA move. Takeda UK also became a branch in 2018 – but more as a result of the acquisition of Shire, and a subsequent global reorganisation.

This does not seem to have had much impact on the 46 or so Japanese pharmaceuticals and healthcare companies in the UK, however, in terms of numbers employed. We estimate they were employing around 5,000 people in 2022, and this number has grown rather than shrunk since 2016, despite the closure of some smaller companies – Taisho, Anges, Kosei and Summit. Companies which have grown in the UK include Fujifilm Diosynth, now employing over 1,000 people and Eisai, compensating for those which have shrunk their UK presence.

The UK may have lost some influence, but in terms of scale, it is still substantial.

 

For more content like this, subscribe to the free Rudlin Consulting Newsletter. 最新の在欧日系企業の状況については無料の月刊Rudlin Consulting ニューズレターにご登録ください。

Share Button
Read More

Last updated by Pernille Rudlin at 2025-06-13.

Search

Recent Posts

  • Japanese financial services in the UK and EMEA
  • The puzzle of Japanese foreign direct investment in the UK
  • What’s going on in Japanese HR? – online seminar July 3 15:00-16:30 BST/10:00-11:30 EST
  • What is a Japanese company anyway?
  • Largest Japan owned companies in the UK – 2024

Categories

  • Africa
  • Brexit
  • China and Japan
  • Corporate brands, values and mission
  • Corporate culture
  • Corporate Governance
  • cross cultural awareness
  • CSR
  • customer service
  • Digital Transformation
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • European companies in Japan
  • European identity
  • Foreign Direct Investment
  • Globalization
  • History of Japanese companies in UK
  • Human resources
  • Innovation
  • Internal communications
  • Japanese business etiquette
  • Japanese business in Europe
  • Japanese customers
  • M&A
  • Management and Leadership
  • Marketing
  • Middle East
  • negotiation
  • Presentation skills
  • Reputation
  • Seminars
  • speaker events
  • Sustainability
  • Trade
  • Uncategorized
  • Virtual communication
  • webinars
  • Women in Japanese companies
  • Working for a Japanese company

RSS Rudlin Consulting

  • Japanese financial services in the UK and EMEA
  • The puzzle of Japanese foreign direct investment in the UK
  • What’s going on in Japanese HR? – online seminar July 3 15:00-16:30 BST/10:00-11:30 EST
  • What is a Japanese company anyway?
  • Largest Japan owned companies in the UK – 2024
  • Japanese companies in the UK 20 years on
  • Australia overtakes China as second largest host of Japanese nationals living overseas
  • Japanese financial services companies in the UK and EMEA after Brexit
  • The history of Japanese financial services companies in the UK and EMEA
  • Reflections on the past forty years of Japanese business in the UK – what’s next? – 7

Search

Affiliates

Japan Intercultural Consulting

Cross cultural awareness training, coaching and consulting. 異文化研修、エグゼクティブ・コーチング と人事コンサルティング。

Subscribe to our newsletter

Recent Blogposts

  • Japanese financial services in the UK and EMEA
  • The puzzle of Japanese foreign direct investment in the UK
  • What’s going on in Japanese HR? – online seminar July 3 15:00-16:30 BST/10:00-11:30 EST
  • What is a Japanese company anyway?
  • Largest Japan owned companies in the UK – 2024

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Posts pagination

1 2 … 10 »
Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Web Development: counsell.com

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising, and analytics partners.