Management and Leadership

Makihara Minoru

I was sad to hear of the death of Makihara Minoru, former president of Mitsubishi Corporation, on 13th December 2020. He was my daisempai (most senior mentor) – both tough and supportive to work for. A wise visionary on globalization, he was progressive in his attitude towards women and non-Japanese employees in Mitsubishi Corporation and spoke elegant, fluent mid-Atlantic English. He was the ultimate Mitsubishi shinshi (gentleman).

I have taken some extracts from my book on the history of Mitsubishi Corporation in London as a tribute to him:

London – 1959 – “If you were your father, you would not have done this”

In 1959 Makihara Minoru was posted to London to take over the tinned salmon, crab and mandarin orange business. He was the son of Makihara Satoru, who was the General Manager of the London branch from 1939 to 1940 and also was in charge of the tinned salmon and crab business in London from 1927 to 1937. ‘I did business with many of the people that my father did business with. They remembered my father very fondly and were always telling me “if you were your father, you would not have done this…”‘ One such business partner was Dan Tobey, of Unilever, the largest single customer of Mitsubishi for tinned salmon. The rest of the tinned salmon was done through the same brokers as before the war, Anderson & Colman. Mr Colman had also been a friend of Makihara senior. One of Anderson & Colman’s largest customers was Princes Foods, whom Mitsubishi Corporation was to acquire in the 1980s.

Mitsubishi Corporation was the dominant supplier from Japan to the UK of tinned salmon and Japan was still the main supplier of tinned salmon to the UK in the 1960s.

The Japanese community in London in the 1960s

Makihara Minoru was in London until 1967. Despite the tripling of the number of Japanese resident in the UK during the 1960s, according to Makihara “there were still too few Japanese in London to feel that there was a community.” The 1000 residents barrier was broken by the late 1960s, and just as before the war, Japanese restaurants began to appear in London. The lifting of travel restrictions by the Japanese government also stimulated tourism and business travel from Japan to London. Up until then, Mitsubishi’s Japanese employees had to improvise, trying to find Chinese restaurants that most suited Japanese tastes.

Despite the lifting of travel restrictions Makihara only returned to Japan once in the eight years he lived in the UK, and made an international phone call to Japan just once a year.

Half of the Japanese Mitsubishi staff lived in South London and half in the North. Hampstead (where the Makiharas had lived before the war) and Finchley had become popular amongst Japanese, known as J&J town (Jewish and Japanese) but Makihara chose Purley. “Because my superior Mr Itoh had decided to seek other directions and had moved to East Croydon. I thought this was a very good choice – the rent was reasonable and the surroundings were much better. We moved twice but always stayed in Purley – the houses had nice gardens and were very superior by Japanese standards. The travelling time was about the same as from Hampstead.” They sent their two children to St David’s School, a small co-educational school in Purley.

Bridging the division between local and Japanese staff

According to Makihara Minoru, there was no clear division of roles between Japanese and British staff in Marine Products Department and the Japanese and British staff would visit the brokers together.

There was, however, inevitably some friction between the Japanese and British staff. In Makihara’s view, this arose for two reasons: differences in style of work and differences in native language.

“As far as style of work was concerned, while the Japanese staff tend to work together and share information, which is the basic foundation of a general trading company, the British staff would tend to guard their territory and, on occasion, be unwilling to share information with others, even when that would have enhanced the business. This fact was aggravated by the language barrier. Even when Japanese staff were carrying out a normal conversation in Japanese, some suspicious British staff would imagine that they were being talked about behind their backs. Telexes used to come from Japan mainly in Japanese, which was another source of friction. I frequently requested Tokyo that telexes be sent in English but this was mostly in vain, and as a result, a lot of the time of the Japanese staff was taken up by translating telexes into English.”

In order to overcome the language barrier, Makihara started a japanese class for the British staff, but most of the senior men dropped out, leaving Makihara with five of the female staff. His efforts lasted for about two years. “I was finding it increasingly difficult to prepare material and texts for the British staff. Japanese is virtually without grammar, and it is an extremely difficult language to learn.”

Makihara Minoru, born 1930 Hampstead, London. Harvard University BA 1954. Joined Mitsubishi Corporation in 1956. President of Mitsubishi Corporation 1992-1998

For more content like this, subscribe to the free Rudlin Consulting Newsletter. 最新の在欧日系企業の状況については無料の月刊Rudlin Consulting ニューズレターにご登録ください。

The generation gap in working from home in Japan and UK

Despite the UK government’s announcement that companies can allow employees to return to their workplaces from August 1^st2020, the Royal Bank of Scotland told 50,000 of its staff to continue working from home until 2021. A friend who travels into their City of London office once a week tells me it is still eerily quiet and only essential staff are coming in. Lifts can only take 1 person at a time and half of the toilet cubicles have been shut down. A British architect has predicted that this will mean the end of the high-rise office building in London as many firms are making changes for the long-term. Some smaller City firms have shut their office permanently, and others are sub-letting their office space to other businesses.

I see similar trends in Japan too, judging by announcements from banks such as Mizuho or ICT companies such as Fujitsu, wanting to accelerate their digital transformation.

When I was a UK-based employee of Fujitsu ten years’ ago, I used to work from home quite regularly. My team was scattered across the world anyway, so most meetings were done by teleconferencing. Working from home is already well embedded in Europe. For people with children where both parents are working, it is often the only practical solution.

Most people who work in London and have children cannot afford to live centrally, so have long, crowded commutes – just like in Japan. They have no intention of being made to ride on a packed train until a coronavirus vaccine is commonly available.

But there is a generation gap in Europe with regard to working from home, which companies will have to address. Younger, single employees, despite being “digital natives”, are finding working from home very stressful. Partly it is to do with loneliness – for young singles, the workplace represents a vital social life. It is also to do with trust. More senior employees have already built relationships with their co-workers and are confident in their own abilities. Younger people lack that confidence and have not had enough time to prove themselves to their colleagues.

There is also the problem of the environment for working from home. More senior workers have bigger houses. Whereas many young Londoners share houses and flats with other young people. They may have a very small bedroom and no communal rooms apart from a kitchen.

This issue is true for city dwellers in Japan as well of course – a 1 bedroom apartment may have no space for a desk or the possibility of shutting the door on noise and distractions.

But it seems there is one dissimilarity between Japan and Europe – which is that middle aged people in Japan find working from home stressful too. As managers, they have been used to evaluating staff on the amount of effort put in, rather than results, and communicating through horenso and ishindenshin. None of these approaches work well remotely. Digital transformation is going to be as much about managing people as managing ICT.

This article originally appeared in Japanese in The Teikoku Databank News on 12 August 2020

Medium Term Plan Disease

Many Japanese companies have a Mid or Medium Term Plan, usually covering three years, announced by incoming Presidents, with a second one issued half way through their 6 year term. It is sometimes translated into English, but often in a way that does not resonate with employees outside Japan. This lack of awareness or sense of connection to the MTP outside of Japan HQ is a problem for Japanese companies who want to be truly global.

The difference between a world class company and Japanese companies is reflected in the way the Mid Term Plan is developed, says Hioki Keisuke, a partner at Boston Consulting Group Japan, in a recent series in Diamond business magazine on “Reasons why Japanese companies cannot compete globally”.

He looks at various definitions of global, world class companies and notes that only two Japanese companies can be seen as global – Canon and Sony – by Alan Rugman’s definition of having less than half of their sales in their home region with two other regions representing 20% or more of sales.

Three tests of global maturity

Hioki adds three tests of being truly global:

Can your company count its global cash holdings? How much, in what currency and where, by subsidiary?
Is global talent visible? Is the information needed for discovering, training and promoting talented employees globally available, showing their experience and skills?
Is the direction of the company clear? Are management aware of the environment in which it operates, the strengths, the uniqueness and the businesses to focus on?

He points out that many Japanese multinationals still operate on the old international model, where there is a headquarters, which sits above the business divisions, who in turn control the domestic and international subsidiaries. He calls this the “Group company” model, operating on an “entity base” where there is “a castle in every domain” – a reference to the Edo feudal era in Japan.

The transnational model

World class companies are “one company” operating on a function base. There is a corporate function, but not specifically located in any one geographic region. The business units report into it, and the finance, HR, Legal, R&D, marketing and IT functions supply services across the subsidiaries, and also report into the corporate function.

When I was at Mitsubishi Corporation in the 1990s, I remember getting excited about the transnational model which Sumantra Ghoshal and Christopher Bartlett had outlined in their “Managing Across Borders” book of 1989. Hioki points out that although that seemed a far away ideal then, it is the reality now for most world class global companies.

As well as trying to promote that model internally as an organisational structure for Mitsubishi Corporation, I became involved in helping the Corporate Planning Office turn the Medium Term Plan into something that made sense in English. It was then that I realised that there was something about the Japanese language itself, as well as the way the Medium Term Plan was compiled that meant it was both extremely vague, and yet based on a huge amount of detail, gathered “bottom up”. What was lacking was what a Western company would recognise as a strategy, to link the detailed plans to the vision for the future.

Scenario planning vs vague vision

According to Hioki, the Mid Term Plan in a world class company should be seen as “guidance” across 2-3 years, and a link between the megatrends or scenarios and the annual commitment plans. It should be revised every year and then a commitment plan and forecast for the year and each quarter developed from it.

I remember about 10 years’ ago the bafflement expressed by a group of senior managers working at a German automotive company when their counterparts in a Japanese automotive company said they had never heard of scenario planning. Hioki says many Japanese companies are now working on scenarios and megatrends, but the long term, medium term and short term plans are still independent events. This was not quite the case at Mitsubishi Corporation, but certainly the Corporate Planning Office had an unenviable task in trying to tie what they were told was the plan by each business unit into something that cohered with the vision that the President had.

The origins of the Mid Term Plan

Hioki says the Mid Term Plan has its origins in 1956 when Panasonic’s founder, Matsushita Konosuke first introduced the Matsushita Electric 5 Year plan. “More than 60 years have passed since then. It’s not that a mid term plan is bad, but I think it’s time to adopt a way that suits the present times.”

The transnational model was meant to provide a way to trade off globally efficient integration and regional localisation and optimisation. Production is decentralised, and each region develops its own specialities and differentiated value add, but global management is integrated, knowledge is centralised but R&D and development is done through collaboration and shared around the world.

Functions first, not as an afterthought

Hioki also argues that accounting & finance, HR and legal functions should be actively involved in planning and strategy, rather than coming after the business divisions, cleaning and tidying up. Hashimoto Katsunori, former CFO of DuPont Japan and now professor at Tokyo Metropolitan Business School points out that another difference between world class and Japanese companies is “cash awareness”. The response to the coronavirus crisis should be to stash as much cash as possible to ride it out, but Japanese companies were not quick to do this. Japanese companies tend to be cash rich anyway, but also they do not see their cash reserves as belonging to the shareholders, the way world class companies do. And as a consequence, they prioritise sales over profits. They do not understand that cash flow contributes to corporate value.

Hioki describes traditional HR in Japanese companies as behaving like teachers with a grade book, pulling people up for mistakes and spending their whole time creating systems. In a world class company, HR should be about ensuring that the vision, mission and values of the company permeate throughout the organisation, as well as contributing to the development and growth of the company and its employees.

“Japanese companies are weak at the top” – Horiba’s CEO

I was recently asked what Japanese company’s mission statement I most admired and I said Horiba’s “Omoshiro okashiku” which is translated into English as “Joy and Fun” (but the fun also means quirky, or as Horiba says “interesting” which is what I think many Japanese companies are to Western eyes, and that’s a good thing). I know from reports from our consultants in Germany that this ethos is transmitted to the overseas subsidiaries too. This interview with the President of Horiba in Nikkei Business by Higashi Masaki, the Editor, is so interesting, I have not made a precis, rather with big help from Google Translate, have left it pretty much as is.

——————

Since Horiba Atsushi took office as president, sales have increased more than five times, and overseas employees are now the majority, transforming it into a global company. He has also developed a unique corporate culture, including calling employees “Horibarians” regarding them as part of the family. We asked about Japan’s challenges as seen by companies competing globally in technology development.

(Interviewer: Masaki Higashi, Editor-in-Chief of Nikkei Business)

PROFILE

Atsushi Horiba was born in 1948 in Kyoto Prefecture. After graduating from Konan University Faculty of Science in 1971, he joined Olson Horiba, Inc. of the United States. He then joined HORIBA, Ltd. in 1972. He is also graduated from the Department of Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of California, USA in 1977. After that, he directed the overseas expansion of the group, and after working as a director in 1982 and managing director in 1988, became president in 1992. He has also served as chairman since 2005. He has been in his current position for18 years. He is also the face of the local business community, such as serving as the vice chairman of the Kansai Economic Federation. He is the eldest son of Masao Horiba, the founder of HORIBA, Ltd.

The automobile industry is greatly affected by the new coronavirus.

It was a difficult time for car makers even without the coronavirus. This is because there is a dramatic switch towards “CASE” (Connected, Autonomous, Sharing, Electric). It is necessary to move from the “hard” industry, which competes through productivity gains to steadily manufacture high-quality cars, to the “light” industry, which has become IT (information technology) intensive. What was a simultaneous equation with one variable has now become treble the pain.

HORIBA has the largest share of car exhaust gas inspection equipment in the world. The main business is conventional car-related products.

Electric vehicles will be the mainstream in urban areas. However, the combustion type will not disappear in areas with harsh climates. Regulations will also become stricter. However, it is not a growing market, so I would like to expand the CASE field.

How to secure human resources is very important. In 2015, we acquired a British company called Mira (which supports the development of automobiles). We wanted the excellent R & D unit of about 600 people, but it also had test equipment related to CASE. Mira’s test track has research bases for automobile manufacturers such as Toyota (automobile) and major parts manufacturers, so tests and research can be done together.

The company motto is “Joy and Fun”, but is that feeling the same even with the coronavirus?

Now more than ever is the time to have “joy and fun”. All managers are at a loss now. Even so, we don’t feel so sad because we are working in various fields under this company motto. “Fun” does not mean “funny” but “interesting”. With that idea, we shifted our direction. It’s not absolute, but I feel that this helps us be responsive.

It is necessary to strike a good balance between being extremely advanced in a specific field and expanding the range in order to foster new businesses?

To be honest, I don’t think this is managed properly. But that’s what’s interesting, and it’s made up of the enthusiasm of each unit. Trust is at the base. For example, if you are studying optics, you can think of many people who would be good to consult with within the company.

It is unreasonable to expect people who are developing the products that are profitable now think about what the future needs will be. There is no Superman in the world. In many cases, human resources are crushed in search of Superman.

What kind of human resources are you looking for?

I often say that I don’t want a guy who has a good memory, that is, a guy who just graduated from a good university with good grades. Some of the students who are considered to be excellent in the world outside join us, but from our point of view, they are also “stupid” children (laughs). I often join in on the quiz shows for highly educated people on TV, but they are just competing for memory and have no sense.

What does ‘sense’ mean?

Whether you are interested. That is, whether you can do “joy and fun” However, if only “sharp angled” human resources are hired, the company will collapse. That is the balance.

In order to maximize the breadth of the business, it is necessary to have an organizational structure for that purpose.

Now, the biggest issue is the wall between each department. In a pyramid-type organization, individual departments do their best, but there is no interface to connect the results. But if the organization is flat, it’s not necessary. It’s in a mixed state. Instead, the person above needs to be a Superman who can figure out where and what is going on (laughs).

Is the solid financial structure with an equity ratio of over 50% also a factor that guarantees the realization of “interesting and funny”?

Companies with weak internal reserves will have a hard time during coronavirus. When it was said that it was bad to retain earnings, I thought that retained earnings should definitely be increased. This is to ensure that opportunities for M & A (merger / acquisition) are not missed. If you have to ask the bank for money, it may be too late and the target is acquired by someone else.

What do you see as the challenges facing the Japanese economy now?

We manufacture all the key products such as detectors, filters and electronic boards in-house. The problem with Japan is that we have go outside to get the basic science for these key products. You cannot apply knowledge if you do not have the basic science. Nevertheless, Japanese industry and academia are only doing applied science.

We have R & D units in France, Germany and the United States because the academia of these countries never let go of the basic science. Not only is China accumulating product know-how, but it is also conducting basic research. China is the best-selling market for the latest optical analyzer developed in France. It’s neither Japan nor the United States. We need to be aware of the fact that China is doing this very thoroughly.

It is a worry that China’s technological capabilities are rising rapidly.

Japan has not lost yet. I just don’t know after 4-5 years where we’ll be. They are thinking very clearly about the combination of academia and industry. The winners and losers in a battle of comprehensive strength are becoming clear. How do you get around this? I don’t like the word “niche,” but we’ve survived because we’ve put more people and money into a specialty than a giant company.

The Japanese, and Japanese technology and schools are excellent. However, various regulations and past shackles are in the way. For example, why does the faculty council have personnel rights even at universities? At Tsinghua University in China, the top management is steadily being replaced with excellent human resources. But in Japan, once you get tenure, you stay in academia until retirement. This is such an unfair situation.

Are there any other obstacles to your competitiveness?

If I weren’t Japanese, I would have headquartered in California, USA, and the company would have been three times as large as it is now. Taxes are high and fixed costs are high in Japan. Our main medical base is located in France because of problems with Japanese regulations. We just pay lip service to “deregulation” and in the meantime Japan declines.

Industry-academia-government must think about industrial policy and decide what to make a strength.

Even if the government and others hold meetings to gather the top executives of large companies, they cannot take the plunge because they have a company. When I first became President I was called by the Ministry of International Trade and Industry (currently the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry), and when I talked about what I thought, I wasn’t called on again. The people around me just gave textbook answers.

However, the current Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry is different from that time. What is worrisome is that bureaucrats who are trying to reform in line with our opinion tend to be off the career track.

Do they not want to change?

Perhaps they prioritize their own lives rather than the country. The sense of life or death of officials and politicians of the Meiji era is not there. I’m afraid that there is no sense of crisis about the fact that Japan is buying in more and more technology now.

China’s “brain” is talented people educated in the United States. There is no brain in Japan. People who are active (at the forefront) don’t end up leading government councils. Even if the technology and the times change, Japan still has excellent human resources, but they cannot “overtake” the incumbents. It’s the same with the top executives of large companies.

Because the term of office is fixed, the number of “salarymen” in top management has increased.

There is absolutely no business that will produce results in 6 years [the usual stint as President of a Japanese company] after investing from zero. It just means continual losses.

It takes at least two years for our products to be researched, tested, designed and finalized. It will be five years if the basic research is redone. It will take another 2-3 years to make a profit from it. Many things can be done with technology and machines, but this is useless if you do not develop people as well.

When the top executive who started a growth business retires after six years, and that business is making losses, he is said to be the “worst executive”, and when the next top executive harvests from what his predecessor has sown, he is celebrated as “great”. That shouldn’t be the case.

Don’t avoid developing leaders

What does it take to enable top management to think about things in the long run?

Japan is overwhelmingly strong in terms of both technology and human resources. The only weakness is the top. The United States and China are working hard on how to raise the elite. If we don’t train leaders, society won’t progress. On the other hand, in Japan, “elite” is a forbidden concept. In Japan, both politicians and business owners are a disorderly mob.

Japan is in a very dangerous state now. It has become a bogus democracy. True democracy has competition, and everyone is different. In the United States, they first educate elementary school pupils about how different each person is. But in Japan, it’s like “stop it, you’re annoying the old guy.” The responsibility of the media is also heavy.

It’s rare for a person at the top of a listed company to have a beard.

I nearly died of hepatitis when I was about 35 years old. Until then, I was just being the diligent president’s son. But at that time, I thought this is a turning point and I thought I would live a life where I do what I think is best, no matter what others say. My beard is a proof of that. From then on it became a lot easier.

You don’t know what works and how it works.

It feels like God only knows the future (laughs). However, there is a belief that we will make the best decision at that time by listening directly to the stories of people on the front line. I’ve done my best so I can’t help if it doesn’t work. However, people end up worrying about seeking more than the best.

You end up just wanting the correct answer.

The difficulty of management is that there is no correct answer. Everyone has the illusion that there is a correct answer, but there isn’t. The answer will come.

Side note from the interviewer Higashi Masaki

I don’t know if it’s because Japan has become richer or there is more inequality now, but as Mr. Horiba points out, “how individuals live” rather than the desirable way of organizations such as countries and companies should be has become increasingly the priority. It is important to note that the pursuit of personal well-being can sometimes be inconsistent with the interests of the organization.

For example, there is a tendency for top management to change and quickly write off assets of unprofitable businesses to generate a deficit. Then their predecessor has not made a loss, and the successor is certain to recover in a V shape during his term. The rewards for the two executives may be good, but is the timing as an organization optimal? As the mobility of talent increases, the relationship between individuals and organizations can become more difficult.

Japanese companies need a strong employee brand to attract globally minded employees

I spoke to a group of Japanese managers in London last year on the topic of my last article “I love Japan but I don’t want to work in a Japanese company” – an attitude I have heard from young Europeans who have studied Japanese at university, or worked in Japan for a couple of years on the JET scheme, or simply became fans of Japanese culture through a love of anime and computer games.

They don’t want to work for Japanese companies because they think they won’t have a fun and fulfilling career. They worry that there will be lots of overtime, bureaucracy and an oppressive hierarchy – and that Japanese companies in Europe are mostly dull, engineering sales subsidiaries.

My recommendation to the Japanese managers in the audience was to strengthen the “employee brand” in Europe, to make it more appealing to those young people. Many European veterans of Japanese companies have told me that they like working for Japanese companies because they are different, interesting, quirky, more “human” and long term in orientation rather than the standardised, numbers driven, short termist culture of many Western multinationals. Japanese companies should also offer short term secondments to Japan, so that their non-Japanese graduate hires can build networks and participate in decision-making and so develop their careers.

I realise it is tough for Japanese managers in Europe to ask their Japanese headquarters to adjust their employee brand just to appeal to overseas recruits, when Japan headquarters probably think their priority is to hire the best globally minded Japanese graduates.

So I showed them some research from Japanese recruitment company DISCO’s Caritas Research 2020 survey of Japanese students graduating from foreign and Japanese universities. It illustrates that the needs of Japanese students from foreign universities are similar to those of European students.

Whereas graduates from Japanese universities preferred a job which will provide them a secure lifestyle, would rather work in Japan rather than overseas and to work for one company for a long time, the preference of Japanese graduates of foreign universities was for a job which helped them realise their dreams, paid well, and would prefer to work overseas rather than stay in Japan.

Apart from strengthening the employee brand and offering more attractive career paths, another recommendation I made was that management training was needed for Japanese expatriates in leadership, giving feedback, managing diversity and being inclusive when managing Europeans.

I was of course hoping this would lead to more business for my company, but judging by one of the managers who approached me afterwards, it might not be for the reasons I expected. The managing director said his company was 80% Japanese, but there were big communication gaps between the younger generation and the older, between those who had graduated from foreign universities or lived abroad, and those who had mainly worked, lived and studied in Japan. Clearly Japanese companies are having to adjust to different mindsets amongst Japanese employees too.

A video of Pernille Rudlin’s presentation on this topic is available on the Rudlin Consulting YouTube channel here in English and here in Japanese.

The original version of this article was published in Japanese in the Teikoku Databank News. Pernille Rudlin’s new book “Shinrai: Japanese Corporate Integrity in a Disintegrating Europe” is available as a paperback and Kindle ebook on Amazon.

“There is no point in workstyle reforms if you don’t change everything at once” – Fujitsu’s President Tokita

President Tokita of Fujitsu was interviewed by Saeki Shinya of the Nikkei Business magazine in August 2020. The beginning of the interview focused on the impact of the pandemic and China on Fujitsu’s business but the bulk of the interview was regarding Fujitsu’s recent announcement of various workstyle reforms (the English translation of hatarakikata kaikaku, a government led initiative to change Japanese workplaces).

Tokita felt Japan was unlikely to recover economically from COVID-19 until the end of FY 2021. As for China, clearly this was a delicate subject and Nikkei Business had to issue a correction to how they described what Tokita said. He said the progression of nationalism should not be welcomed. It would be disrespectful to say it’s a great chance for Fujitsu if the USA or Europe move away from Huawei, however the need for a secure communication infrastructure is important, regardless, for a more resilient society, and this is helping Fujitsu employees to “reset their mindset”.

The Q&A regarding workstyle reforms I have translated as below:

Q: Why did Fujitsu announce work style reforms such as a 50 percent reduction in office space, the abolition of commuting passes, the introduction of telework allowances and job-type employment (to assign and evaluate human resources after clarifying duties such as roles and skills to be fulfilled) all at once?

Mr. Tokita: It just happened that way – actually I narrowed down the scope somewhat.

In the first place, we didn’t announce it in July just because of coronavirus. We have been introducing telework since 2017, and we had already introduced a job type system overseas – only Japan was different. Since I became president last year, I realised Fujitsu’s biggest value is that its 130,000 employees can move in the same vector. Therefore, I wanted to unify the way we work, and we thought that we should utilise good governance as a global company.

Q: You had experience of being assigned to Europe – you had doubts yourself about the difference in personnel systems in Japan and overseas?

Mr. Tokita: My desire for globalization was strong. In fact, I hated the phrase “one Fujitsu” when I first became president. It was used because we were not “1” but there was no point in using it like a slogan if behaviours don’t change. I used it officially for the first time in June when we celebrated our 85^th birthday, because our internal systems and communication have now improved, and we are convinced that it can happen.

Work style reforms have been carried out in many different ways. There are also criticisms that the results based system failed and there were people saying “how much longer are we going to use man-months as a basis for calculation?” I understood all of this. That’s why this time it happened all at once.

So far, we have been reforming little by little. Because it is a large company, it is scary if the change is too big. However, the reason why it did not work was that the personnel system itself had not changed in nature. Changing if you only change the structure and operations superficially will not work. I decided to go with the idea to change everything at once.

Q: Isn’t there an overlap between the new “job type” system and the failed results based system [known as seikashugi in Japanese – introduced in many companies in the 1990s]?

Tokita: There are many viewpoints – some say the results based system failed, and I haven’t heard many stories of it succeeding.

However, a job type system will be different from company to company and for Fujitsu. Evaluations are no longer top down. We have no choice but try to make sure it will lead to Fujitsu’s growth and sustainable business. Of course there are some lessons to be learnt from what happened in the past but I try not to worry too much about that.

Q: What does Fujitsu want employees to do with the introduction of a job-type personnel system?

Mr. Tokita: It’s about each and every employee being autonomous. If the general employees, the managers, the executive, and I are all autonomous individuals, the collective body becomes stronger. Ideally, a strong individual can both work collaboratively and create a healthy conflict. We stopped uniform education by hierarchy and year of entry to the company. Instead, we encourage people to advance their careers through free educational programs online.

Q: How do you get your employees to collaborate once they haves become autonomous?

Tokita: We are currently working with in-house culture change teams. In order to work collaboratively, physical contact is necessary, so it is important to create space in various offices where people can discuss each other’s opinions.

Q: It is said that young people are disadvantaged because they do not have enough experience of the job-type personnel system, what are your thoughts on this?

Tokita: Is that so? I didn’t think it was an advantage or a disadvantage. I know OJT (on-the-job training) was inadequate. Rather, I hope that young people will be able to take on challenges without any restraints.

Q: Some say that the reforms, which will reduce office space by 50 percent, are just about cutting costs.

Mr. Tokita: It’s not just about cutting the office space in half. It will also cost money for renewal.

The aim is not to cut costs, but to increase the choice of employees. The main objective is to help employees to feel engaged in their work. Whether there is a coronavirus pandemic or not, there are many employees who have problems with commuting time, childcare, and nursing care, and we have been building telework and satellite offices to solve this. It is true that Coronavirus became a driver to push this. But I’ve been thinking about it for a long time. Future behaviours and growth will show if this is correct or not

Q: Many people say that the corona shock will accelerate digital transformation (DX). Isn’t this is an opportunity for Fujitsu, which advocates DX for companies?

Mr. Tokita: I’ve been working longer hours at home so I saw a daytime show which said that digital transformation of medical institutions, public health centers and education is very behind in Japan.

However, DX does not take root just by promoting systemization and IT. The essence of DX is whether each and every one of us can be autonomous, acquire skills, collaborate, and create new value. This is also a challenge for Fujitsu. No matter how much IT as a tool is implemented, it will not be the whole solution.

Q: So DX hasn’t taken root in Fujitsu yet?

Mr. Tokita: I don’t think it has.

It doesn’t make sense for DX only to develop in certain industries. Fujitsu has been promoting IT by forming teams across industries. It will not function unless the whole aspect of an issue is grasped, rather than small points, and the issue is addressed as a society.

Coronavirus has increased the need to do this, but we need a system that allows us to collaborate properly. It’s easy to standardize in the IT industry, but without a deeper or higher level of common understanding of rules, no one will be able to make it work.

Q: Japan as a whole needs to deepen its understanding of DX. What should we do?

Mr. Tokita: It will be difficult to discuss on a national basis. We have no choice but to move forward with small communities and companies. In that sense, Fujitsu has a responsibility. We are a global large company and have a mission to solve Japan’s problems because we are based in Japan.

Inside the company, I often say, “Think about what it means to work for a large company.” Large companies have large company sized responsibilities. A large company can make big ripples in society – that’s a kind of responsibility.

Mr. Tokita: We will make use of our own knowledge and experience. This will make Fujitsu stronger. Companies that have accumulated their own experience and can turn it into a business are definitely stronger. If you don’t do it yourself, you’ll end up in running a race in borrowed shoes, and you can’t be a strong company.

If you want to hear more from Mr Tokita, he’s one of the keynote speakers at the Fujitsu ActivateNow digital event in October – more information here

If you want to understand further about the history and changes to Japanese corporate HR systems, I made a 5 minute video on this for my Japanese Business Mysteries Explained series – here.

What Japanese expatriates should do if they don’t get on with their local boss

A 28 year old Japanese female writes to the Nikkei Business Online: “I didn’t get along well with my boss when I was posted overseas and ended up with mental health issues and returned to Japan.”

“My boss only cared about a big project that would be of benefit to them, that Japan headquarters had no chance of approving. My boss kept making me do the negotiations and aggressively asking me if it was done yet. I couldn’t get my Japan HQ boss to intervene. I explained as clearly as I could to my boss that Japan headquarters had told me when I was there that there was no chance this project would be adopted. My boss refused to listen and would not even join me in negotiating with Japan HQ.

“I told them there was another project I was working on which was more urgent but my boss told me to prioritize their project. I became stressed and could not go into the office any more. My boss made out that I was the problem and my boss in Japan eventually accepted this and I was returned to Japan. I really cannot accept the way I was treated – or should I just have accepted it? How should I have dealt with this?”

Ueda Junji, formerly of Itochu and President of Family Mart: “First of all, you are still young, so try to see this as a useful experience for the future. You say you had mental health problems, and actually being an expatriate is mentally very stressful. So having experienced this at an early stage should be of help to you later on in your career.

“Secondly, in trying to think what is behind that boss’s behaviour, just seeing it as them wanting to do it entirely for their own ambitions may be too harsh. Managers in any country want to pursue projects that they think are beneficial. And of course if it goes well it may lead to their promotion.”

“On the other hand, you say you had another project which you thought was more urgent, but since you are a member of a team, you have to accept the decision of your boss, if they say another project is higher priority.”

“I wonder whether being told by Japan HQ before you were posted that this project had no chance of being adopted already sowed seeds of distrust in your mind? Then explaining this to your local boss, however carefully, will have got the relationship off to a bad start. They may have seen you as just a spy from headquarters and hard to tolerate.”

“It might have been better to try to see it from the local perspective – Japan headquarters don’t really understand what is going on overseas. Try to be more like an ally to your local boss and come to your own judgement as to whether or not the project is workable. Maybe first of all ask the boss what their aims and objectives are with the project, then get them to explain this again to Japan headquarters and then see how Japan headquarters reacts, before coming to any conclusion.”

Ueda’s somewhat unsympathetic comments may come as a surprise but is an example of the tough love that Japanese bosses can be capable of. It’s reassuring that he was able to see the perspective of the local boss so clearly. It’s also also understandable how a Japanese junior expatriate, whose ultimate career lies back in Japan, will see it as their job just to comply with Japan headquarters rather than ally with the local management.

If you’re a boss to Japanese expatriate employees and/or trying to persuade Japan headquarters to accept your proposal, you may find our online coaching on building relations with Japan HQ a useful resource. More details and registration here.

Farewell egalitarianism – Sony introduces salary gaps for graduate hires

A 25 year old Sony employee, with a postgraduate degree in mechanical engineering and skilled in multiple programming languages was promoted to job grade I3 within three months of starting at the company. This meant his salary was increased by Y50,000 (US$460) a month and he can also qualify for higher bonuses. This would not have been possible until at least two years had been completed at the company previously.

This new system was introduced by Sony this year, whereby ability and work effectiveness are assessed and a grade from I1 to I9 is assigned. Sony had already restructured its management level from 2015. 40% of all employees were in management grades, due to the egalitarian, seniority based promotion system, but many were “name only” managers. The “name only” managers were all demoted to non-management grades.

The mura mentality

Sony has to compete with GAFA (Google, Apple, Facebook and Amazon) for top talent, so the old Japanese mura (village) mentality where everyone is a member of the village, and treated equally regardless of their work content and where they work, with lifetime employment and seniority based promotion was not sufficiently attractive.

Now those who wish to join Sony can choose from 70 possible entry routes – those joining from university can choose 3 from the 70. It is not all controlled by HR as in the past – individual business executives are also involved in the recruitment process. They proceed straight to the job they have applied for, rather than go through a general training period.

But not firing

The Nikkei wonders how this will impact firing, not just hiring. With the Japanese mura system, the ability to dismiss employees is severely restricted. Sony has said it can demote or refuse to promote people, but it will not fire them. Keidanren, the Japanese employers’ association, says that while it is generally in favour of HR systems becoming more focused on role content and performance, it thinks the Japanese approach of reassigning people to other jobs if they are not performing in their current role is still preferable.

Surviving the end of lifetime employment in Japan – if you’re an underworked uncle

Plenty of Japanese companies went virtual, scaled back, cancelled or postponed their entrance ceremonies for new graduate recruits this year, because of COVID-19. Hitachi had already cancelled its entrance ceremony, however, and changed it to a Career Kick-off Session (which has also been postponed) to mark the radical departure it has made from lifetime employment and seniority based promotion.

Since its record breaking loss in 2008/9, Hitachi has moved away from simply cutting employee numbers to reduce costs and instead radically altered its business portfolio and introduced a new HR system. President Nakanishi was responding to the often heard concern in the company that “we don’t have any leaders who are effective globally” – a major problem when Hitachi was moving away from being a purely domestic supplier to Japanese energy companies to be more active globally in social infrastructure.

Japan HR as “just one of the regions”

In 2011 Hitachi tore down the 3 distinct layers of its old HR structure – Hitachi HQ’s own HR division, the HR divisions of the Hitachi group companies and the HR divisions of overseas subsidiaries. Now there is a global HR division, 30% of whose employees are non-Japanese. Each region reports into the global HR division, with Japan being one of the regions along with Europe, the Americas, Asia etc. The HR departments of the subsidiaries within those regions report into the appropriate regional HR division. This presumably means the group companies have far less autonomy and Hitachi HQ and Japan are just “one of” the regional or subsidiary divisions.

Hitachi also moved away from the “Shokuno” model much used by Japanese companies – where experience and potential of the employee are the key factors in deciding pay and grade to the “job” model – where each post carries a detailed job description and the pay is determined by the market rate for jobs requiring similar levels of skills and experience.

Toyota goes triangular

Toyota‘s President Akio Toyoda has also begun to have doubts about lifetime employment and seniority based pay. Last year, during the “Spring Offensive” when Japanese company unions negotiation with the directors on base pay, bonuses and conditions, Toyoda said “I have never felt such a distance between us as I felt this time”.

So in 2020 he introduced a new triangular negotiation structure – instead of unions and directors being face to face, he sat three groups around a triangle – the union, the management/executive officers and the board directors. From April of next year the use of evaulations in setting pay and bonuses will become much more widespread and automatic seniority based pay rises will cease. Differentials in bonuses will also become much wider from July of this year.

Get motivated, underworked uncle!

Similar changes are being made at LIXIL, Ajinomoto, Citizen, Sapporo Breweries and Eisai Pharmaceuticals. The end of lifetime employment and seniority based promotion is seen as mainly about trying to deal with the “hatarakanai ojisan” or “underworked uncle” – middle aged men who are in their management position and being paid accordingly largely because of the length of their experience in the company than the value they are adding.

The rest of the Nikkei Business special feature includes a handy worksheet for underworked uncles, to regain their motivation and revive their careers, with some case studies of career changers and encouraging words from recruiters. The recruiters say that middle aged employees are good networkers who can link their company to other companies and look out for new ideas, that they have good communication skills, a learning mindset and are good negotiators. Sounds like they are going to need all of these to succeed in the final 15 years’ of their careers, if they don’t want to end up gazing out of a window.

New leadership needed in Japan – effort and experience no longer enough

Strengthening human resources has become increasingly urgent for Japanese companies since 2017, rapidly catching up with improving profitability as the top management priority, according to a survey from the Japan Management Association.* Other issues such as increasing sales/market share, or introducing new products and services or reviewing the business portfolio are declining by comparison.

Nikkei Business looks at various ways that Japanese companies are dealing with this, including my old employer Mitsubishi Corporation. Their approach does not seem to be that different from 20 or 30 years ago, which is to treat everyone (at least, those hired in Japan) as if they have leadership potential and offer them opportunities accordingly.

Impact of the Ice Age

The concern of companies (over 75% of respondents to a Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry survey in 2017) is particularly around having sufficient leadership and management resources within the next five years. This is not surprising as the cohort that would be entering into senior management are the group that were most affected by the Ice Age of recruitment, when companies drastically cut back their graduate recruitment in the 1990s to 2000s.

New recruits don’t want to be leaders or specialists

But part three of the Nikkei Business special indicates that the roots of this lack of leadership might be in a mismatch between the expectations of the younger generations and their managers too. New recruits are showing less interest in becoming President than in 1999, more interest in senior roles such as board director or General Manager, but interestingly, less interested in become a specialist.

Generational mismatch, again

The qualities of an ideal leader vary between generations too. In 1999 41.3% chose “someone who listens to the views and wishes of their subordinates” as an ideal quality, but this was chosen by only 26.8% in 2019. “Someone who gives directions politely” was the top choice (44.5%) of the 2019 new graduate recruits, but this was chosen by only 32% of new graduate recruits 20 years previously. The 1999 intake were significantly more keen on leaders who were passionate about their work than the 2019 intake, whereas the 2019 intake valued a leader who places importance on private lives, not only work.

Nikkei Business concludes that the type of leader needed has changed over the decades:

1990s – after the economic bubble burst, strong leaders were needed, who were more top down, able to solve problems using their skills and experience. If you tried hard, you succeeded
2000s – with the spread of information technology it became important to gather in information from the gemba – where the work was happening
2010s onwards – employees place importance on diversity. Globalization and digitalization gain pace – the leader’s skills and experience aren’t always relevant. Effort does not always bring results

*Japan Management Association seems to have given up putting anything new in English on its website since 2017.

Category: Management and Leadership